Use of pasteurised human donor milk across neonatal networks in England
File(s)PHDM England manuscript accepted changes 170118.docx (55.65 KB)
Accepted version
Author(s)
Battersby, C
Mousinho, R Marciano Alves
Longford, N
Modi, N
Type
Journal Article
Abstract
Objectives
To describe the use of pasteurised human donor milk (pHDM) in England and the influence of a human milk bank in the network.
Design
Prospective observational study
Setting
All 163 neonatal units (23 networks) in England 2012–2013.
Patients
Preterm infants born at <32 weeks gestational age (GA).
Main outcome measures
Proportion of infants and care-days fed pHDM during the first 30 postnatal days by network
Methods
We extracted daily patient-level data from the National Neonatal Research Database (NNRD). We fitted a logistic regression of pHDM exposure on the presence of a pHDM bank within the network, with GA, BW z score and network as covariates. Significance was assessed by the likelihood ratio (chi-squared) test.
Results
Data for 13,463 infants were included in the study. Across the networks, the proportion (95%CI) of infants ranged from 2.0% (1.0, 3.0) to 61.0% (57.4%, 64.6%), and the proportion of care-days in which pHDM was fed from 0.08% (0.04%, 0.10%) to 21.9% (19.9%, 24.0%). In three networks <5%, and in seven networks >30% of infants received any pHDM. Variation in the use of pHDM across networks remained significant after adjustment for presence of a human milk bank within the network and all covariates (p < 0.001).
Conclusions
Wide variation of pHDM use in England is not fully explained by presence of a pHDM bank or patient characteristics. This suggests clinical uncertainty about the use of pHDM.
To describe the use of pasteurised human donor milk (pHDM) in England and the influence of a human milk bank in the network.
Design
Prospective observational study
Setting
All 163 neonatal units (23 networks) in England 2012–2013.
Patients
Preterm infants born at <32 weeks gestational age (GA).
Main outcome measures
Proportion of infants and care-days fed pHDM during the first 30 postnatal days by network
Methods
We extracted daily patient-level data from the National Neonatal Research Database (NNRD). We fitted a logistic regression of pHDM exposure on the presence of a pHDM bank within the network, with GA, BW z score and network as covariates. Significance was assessed by the likelihood ratio (chi-squared) test.
Results
Data for 13,463 infants were included in the study. Across the networks, the proportion (95%CI) of infants ranged from 2.0% (1.0, 3.0) to 61.0% (57.4%, 64.6%), and the proportion of care-days in which pHDM was fed from 0.08% (0.04%, 0.10%) to 21.9% (19.9%, 24.0%). In three networks <5%, and in seven networks >30% of infants received any pHDM. Variation in the use of pHDM across networks remained significant after adjustment for presence of a human milk bank within the network and all covariates (p < 0.001).
Conclusions
Wide variation of pHDM use in England is not fully explained by presence of a pHDM bank or patient characteristics. This suggests clinical uncertainty about the use of pHDM.
Date Issued
2018-03-01
Date Acceptance
2018-01-23
Citation
EARLY HUMAN DEVELOPMENT, 2018, 118, pp.32-36
ISSN
0378-3782
Publisher
ELSEVIER IRELAND LTD
Start Page
32
End Page
36
Journal / Book Title
EARLY HUMAN DEVELOPMENT
Volume
118
Copyright Statement
Crown Copyright © 2018 Published by Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved. This manuscript is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/
Identifier
http://gateway.webofknowledge.com/gateway/Gateway.cgi?GWVersion=2&SrcApp=PARTNER_APP&SrcAuth=LinksAMR&KeyUT=WOS:000430033400006&DestLinkType=FullRecord&DestApp=ALL_WOS&UsrCustomerID=1ba7043ffcc86c417c072aa74d649202
Subjects
Science & Technology
Life Sciences & Biomedicine
Obstetrics & Gynecology
Pediatrics
Pasteurised human donor milk
Human milk bank
Preterm
Infant feeding
Newborn
England
RANDOMIZED CLINICAL-TRIAL
BIRTH-WEIGHT INFANTS
BREAST-MILK
UNITS
UK
Publication Status
Published
Date Publish Online
2018-02-22