Repository logo
  • Log In
    Log in via Symplectic to deposit your publication(s).
Repository logo
  • About
  • Communities & Collections
  • Advanced Search
  • Statistics
  • Log In
    Log in via Symplectic to deposit your publication(s).
  1. Home
  2. Faculty of Medicine
  3. Faculty of Medicine
  4. Population-based cohort study of surgical myotomy and pneumatic dilatation as primary interventions for oesophageal achalasia
 
  • Details
Population-based cohort study of surgical myotomy and pneumatic dilatation as primary interventions for oesophageal achalasia
File(s)
Achalasia_primary_treatment_manuscript_BJS_changes merged.docx (50.69 KB)
Accepted version
Author(s)
Markar, SR
Mackenzie, H
Askari, A
Faiz, O
Hoare, J
more
Type
Journal Article
Abstract
Background

The aim of this national population‐based cohort study was to compare rates of reintervention after surgical myotomy versus sequential pneumatic dilatation for the primary management of oesophageal achalasia.
Methods

Patients with oesophageal achalasia diagnosed between 2002 and 2012, and without an intervention in the preceding 5 years were identified from the Hospital Episode Statistics database. Patients were divided into two groups based on the primary treatment, and propensity score matching was used to compensate for differences in baseline characteristics.
Results

Some 14 705 patients were diagnosed with oesophageal achalasia, of whom 7487 (50·9 per cent) received interventional treatment: 1742 (23·3 per cent) surgical myotomy, 4534 (60·6 per cent) pneumatic dilatation and 1211 (16·2 per cent) endoscopic botulinum toxin injection. As age increased, the proportion of patients receiving myotomy decreased and the proportion undergoing dilatation increased. Patients who underwent surgical myotomy were younger (mean age 44·8 years versus 58·5 years among those who had pneumatic dilatation; P < 0·001), a greater proportion had a Charlson co‐morbidity index score of 0 (90·1 versus 87·7 per cent; P = 0·003) and they were more commonly men (55·6 versus 51·8 per cent; P = 0·020). Following propensity score matching, the safety of the two initial treatment approaches was equivalent, with no difference in incidence of oesophageal perforation (1·3 and 1·4 per cent after myotomy and dilatation respectively; P = 0·750). However, dilatation was associated with increased need for reintervention (59·6 versus 13·8 per cent; P < 0·001) and frequency of reinterventions (mean 0·34 versus 0·06 per year; P < 0·001).
Conclusion

Surgical myotomy was associated with a lower rate of reintervention and could be offered as primary treatment in patients with oesophageal achalasia who are fit for surgery. For those unfit for surgery, pneumatic dilatation may provide symptomatic relief with approximately 60 per cent of patients requiring reintervention.
Date Issued
2018-07-01
Date Acceptance
2017-11-27
Citation
British Journal of Surgery, 2018, 105 (8), pp.1028-1035
URI
http://hdl.handle.net/10044/1/61261
DOI
https://www.dx.doi.org/10.1002/bjs.10805
ISSN
1365-2168
Publisher
Wiley
Start Page
1028
End Page
1035
Journal / Book Title
British Journal of Surgery
Volume
105
Issue
8
Copyright Statement
© 2018 Owner. This is the accepted version of the following article: British Journal of Surgery, Volume 105, Issue 8, July 2018, Pages 1028-1035, which has been published in final form at https://dx.doi.org/10.1002/bjs.10805
Identifier
http://gateway.webofknowledge.com/gateway/Gateway.cgi?GWVersion=2&SrcApp=PARTNER_APP&SrcAuth=LinksAMR&KeyUT=WOS:000435268700013&DestLinkType=FullRecord&DestApp=ALL_WOS&UsrCustomerID=1ba7043ffcc86c417c072aa74d649202
Subjects
Science & Technology
Life Sciences & Biomedicine
Surgery
LAPAROSCOPIC HELLER MYOTOMY
RANDOMIZED CONTROLLED-TRIAL
ORAL ENDOSCOPIC MYOTOMY
IDIOPATHIC ACHALASIA
MANAGEMENT
OUTCOMES
MULTICENTER
DILATION
ENGLAND
Publication Status
Published
Date Publish Online
2018-03-30
About
Spiral Depositing with Spiral Publishing with Spiral Symplectic
Contact us
Open access team Report an issue
Other Services
Scholarly Communications Library Services
logo

Imperial College London

South Kensington Campus

London SW7 2AZ, UK

tel: +44 (0)20 7589 5111

Accessibility Modern slavery statement Cookie Policy

Built with DSpace-CRIS software - Extension maintained and optimized by 4Science

  • Cookie settings
  • Privacy policy
  • End User Agreement
  • Send Feedback