Histological outcomes after focal high-intensity focused ultrasound and cryotherapy
File(s)10.1007%2Fs00345-015-1561-0.pdf (581.47 KB) Histology-outcomes Version 4 TS-VK-HUA1-2-2015.docx (148.12 KB)
Published version
Accepted version
Author(s)
Type
Journal Article
Abstract
Introduction
Focal therapy has increasingly become an accepted treatment option for patients with localised prostate cancer. Most follow-up protocols use a mixture of protocol biopsies or “for cause” biopsies triggered by a rising PSA. In this paper, we discuss the histological outcomes from these biopsies and their use in guiding subsequent management and trial development.
Methods
We conducted a literature search and reviewed the post-treatment biopsy results from studies on focal HIFU and focal cryotherapy. We subsequently reviewed the results of three recently published consensus statements released discussing many of the issues concerning focal therapy.
Results
Research suggests that 1 in 5 of all post-treatment biopsies after focal therapy are positive. However, the majority of these seemed to be from the untreated portion of the gland or met criteria for clinically insignificant disease. The histological outcomes from focal therapy are promising and confirm its effectiveness in the short to medium term. Furthermore re-treatment is possible whilst maintaining a low-side-effect profile.
Conclusion
Debate is ongoing about the clinical significance of various levels of residual disease after focal therapy and the exact threshold at which to call failure within a patient who has had focal therapy.
Focal therapy has increasingly become an accepted treatment option for patients with localised prostate cancer. Most follow-up protocols use a mixture of protocol biopsies or “for cause” biopsies triggered by a rising PSA. In this paper, we discuss the histological outcomes from these biopsies and their use in guiding subsequent management and trial development.
Methods
We conducted a literature search and reviewed the post-treatment biopsy results from studies on focal HIFU and focal cryotherapy. We subsequently reviewed the results of three recently published consensus statements released discussing many of the issues concerning focal therapy.
Results
Research suggests that 1 in 5 of all post-treatment biopsies after focal therapy are positive. However, the majority of these seemed to be from the untreated portion of the gland or met criteria for clinically insignificant disease. The histological outcomes from focal therapy are promising and confirm its effectiveness in the short to medium term. Furthermore re-treatment is possible whilst maintaining a low-side-effect profile.
Conclusion
Debate is ongoing about the clinical significance of various levels of residual disease after focal therapy and the exact threshold at which to call failure within a patient who has had focal therapy.
Date Issued
2015-07-01
Date Acceptance
2015-04-13
Citation
World Journal of Urology, 2015, 33 (7), pp.955-964
ISSN
0724-4983
Publisher
Springer Verlag
Start Page
955
End Page
964
Journal / Book Title
World Journal of Urology
Volume
33
Issue
7
Copyright Statement
© The Author(s) 2015. This article is published with open access at Springerlink.com
License URL
Subjects
Science & Technology
Life Sciences & Biomedicine
Urology & Nephrology
Focal therapy
Prostate cancer
Minimally invasive therapy
High-intensity focussed ultrasound
HIFU
Cryotherapy
Histology
Pathology
Trial design
LOCALIZED PROSTATE-CANCER
EXTERNAL-BEAM RADIOTHERAPY
FOLLOW-UP
RADICAL PROSTATECTOMY
THERAPY
ABLATION
BIOPSY
MRI
CRYOABLATION
CRYOSURGERY
Publication Status
Published