Can intangible investment explain the UK productivity puzzle?
File(s)Haskel 2013-02.pdf (1.15 MB)
Working paper
Author(s)
Haskel, J
Goodridge, P
Wallis, G
Type
Report
Abstract
This paper investigates whether intangibles might explain the UK productivity puzzle. We note that since the recession: (a) firms have upskilled faster than before; (b) intangible investment in R&D and software has risen whereas tangible investment has fallen; and (c) intangible and telecoms equipment investment slowed in advance of the recession. We have therefore tested to see if: (a) what looks like labour hoarding is actually firms keeping workers who are employed in creating intangible assets; and (b) the current slowdown in TFP growth is due to the spillover effects of the past slowdown in R&D and telecoms equipment investment. Our main findings are: (a) measured market sector real value added growth since the start of 2008 is understated by 1.6 per cent due to the omission of intangibles; and (b) 0.75 per cent per annum of the TFP growth slowdown can be accounted for by the slowdown in intangible and telecoms investment in the early 2000s. Taken together intangible investment can therefore account for around 5 percentage points of the 16 per cent productivity puzzle. © 2013 National Institute of Economic and Social Research.
Date Issued
2013-05-17
Citation
2013
ISSN
1744-6783
Publisher
Imperial College Business School
Copyright Statement
© 2013 The Authors
Description
24.05.13 KB. Ok to add working paper to Spiral.
Identifier
http://www3.imperial.ac.uk/business-school/research/publications/discussion_papers/haskel%202013-02
2013/02
Publication Status
Published