Repository logo
  • Log In
    Log in via Symplectic to deposit your publication(s).
Repository logo
  • Communities & Collections
  • Research Outputs
  • Statistics
  • Log In
    Log in via Symplectic to deposit your publication(s).
  1. Home
  2. Faculty of Natural Sciences
  3. Grantham Institute for Climate Change
  4. A comparative study of different sorbents in the context of direct air capture (DAC): evaluation of key performance indicators and comparisons
 
  • Details
A comparative study of different sorbents in the context of direct air capture (DAC): evaluation of key performance indicators and comparisons
File(s)
manuscript.v7_2.docx (1.02 MB)
Accepted version
Author(s)
Leonzio, Grazia
Fennell, Paul S
Shah, Nilay
Type
Journal Article
Abstract
Direct air capture can be based on an adsorption system, and the used sorbent (chemisorbents or physisorbents) influences process. In this work, two amine-functionalized sorbents, as chemisorbents, and three different metal organic frameworks, as physisorbents, are considered and compared in terms of some key performance indicators. This was carried out by developing a mathematical model describing the adsorption and desorption stages. An independent analysis was carried out in order to verify data reported in the literature. Results show that the equilibrium loading is a critical parameter for adsorption capacity, energy consumption, and cost. The considered metal organic frameworks are characterized by a lower equilibrium loading (10−4 mol/kg) compared to chemisorbents (10−1 mol/kg). For this reason, physisorbents have higher overall energy consumptions and costs, while capturing a lower amount of carbon dioxide. A reasonable agreement is found on the basis of the operating conditions of the Climeworks company, modelling the use of the same amine cellulose-based sorbent. The same order of magnitude is found for total costs (751 USD/tonneCO2 for our analysis, compared to the value of 600 USD/tonneCO2 proposed by this company)
Date Issued
2022-03-01
Date Acceptance
2022-03-01
Citation
Applied Sciences-Basel, 2022, 12 (5)
URI
http://hdl.handle.net/10044/1/97951
URL
https://www.mdpi.com/2076-3417/12/5/2618
DOI
https://www.dx.doi.org/10.3390/app12052618
ISSN
2076-3417
Publisher
MDPI AG
Journal / Book Title
Applied Sciences-Basel
Volume
12
Issue
5
Copyright Statement
© 2022 by the authors.
Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland.
This article is an open access article
distributed under the terms and
conditions of the Creative Commons
Attribution (CC BY) license (https://
creativecommons.org/licenses/by/
4.0/).
License URL
http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
Sponsor
Engineering & Physical Science Research Council (EPSRC)
Identifier
http://gateway.webofknowledge.com/gateway/Gateway.cgi?GWVersion=2&SrcApp=PARTNER_APP&SrcAuth=LinksAMR&KeyUT=WOS:000769416900001&DestLinkType=FullRecord&DestApp=ALL_WOS&UsrCustomerID=1ba7043ffcc86c417c072aa74d649202
Grant Number
EP/V042432/1
Subjects
Science & Technology
Physical Sciences
Technology
Chemistry, Multidisciplinary
Engineering, Multidisciplinary
Materials Science, Multidisciplinary
Physics, Applied
Chemistry
Engineering
Materials Science
Physics
metal organic frameworks
amine-functionalized sorbents
DAC
adsorption
key performance indicators
METAL-ORGANIC FRAMEWORKS
CARBON-DIOXIDE CAPTURE
VACUUM SWING ADSORPTION
CO2 CAPTURE
AMBIENT AIR
FIXED-BED
FLUE-GAS
AMINE
SILICA
SEPARATION
Publication Status
Published
Article Number
ARTN 2618
About
Spiral Depositing with Spiral Publishing with Spiral Symplectic
Contact us
Open access team Report an issue
Other Services
Scholarly Communications Library Services
logo

Imperial College London

South Kensington Campus

London SW7 2AZ, UK

tel: +44 (0)20 7589 5111

Accessibility Modern slavery statement Cookie Policy

Built with DSpace-CRIS software - Extension maintained and optimized by 4Science

  • Cookie settings
  • Privacy policy
  • End User Agreement
  • Send Feedback