Lived experiences of healthcare workers on the frontline during the COVID-19 pandemic – a qualitative interview study.
File(s)e053680.full.pdf (5.25 MB)
Published version
Author(s)
Grailey, Katherine
Lound, Adam
Brett, S
Type
Journal Article
Abstract
Objectives: This study aimed to investigate the presence of perceived stressors, psychological safety and teamwork in healthcare professionals. As the timeframe for this study spanned the first wave of the COVID-19 pandemic, data were captured demonstrating the impact of the pandemic on these factors.
Design: Qualitative Interview Study
Setting: All staff working within the Emergency and Critical Care Departments of one National Health Service Trust in London, United Kingdom.
Participants: Forty-nine participants were recruited using a purposive sampling technique and interviewed when the first wave of the COVID-19 pandemic had subsided.
Main Outcome Measures: Evaluation of changes in perceived stressors, psychological safety and teamwork in individuals working during the COVID-19 pandemic.
Results: The thematic analysis relating to a participant’s lived experiences whilst working during COVID-19 led to the construction of 5 key themes, including ‘Psychological effects’ and ‘Changes in team dynamics’. Several psychological effects were described, including the presence of psychological distress and insights into the aetiology of moral injury. There was marked heterogeneity in participants response to COVID-19, particularly with respect to changes in team dynamics and the perception of a psychologically safe environment. Descriptions of improved team cohesiveness and camaraderie contrasted with stories of new barriers, notably due to the high workload and the impact of personal protective equipment.
Building on these themes, a map of key changes arising due to the pandemic was developed, highlighting potential opportunities to provide targeted support.
Conclusions: Working on the frontline of a pandemic can have significant implications for healthcare workers, putting them at risk of psychological distress and moral injury, as well as affecting team dynamics. There is striking heterogeneity in the manifestation of these challenges. Team leaders can use the themes and qualitative data from this study to help identify areas for management focus and individual and team support.
Design: Qualitative Interview Study
Setting: All staff working within the Emergency and Critical Care Departments of one National Health Service Trust in London, United Kingdom.
Participants: Forty-nine participants were recruited using a purposive sampling technique and interviewed when the first wave of the COVID-19 pandemic had subsided.
Main Outcome Measures: Evaluation of changes in perceived stressors, psychological safety and teamwork in individuals working during the COVID-19 pandemic.
Results: The thematic analysis relating to a participant’s lived experiences whilst working during COVID-19 led to the construction of 5 key themes, including ‘Psychological effects’ and ‘Changes in team dynamics’. Several psychological effects were described, including the presence of psychological distress and insights into the aetiology of moral injury. There was marked heterogeneity in participants response to COVID-19, particularly with respect to changes in team dynamics and the perception of a psychologically safe environment. Descriptions of improved team cohesiveness and camaraderie contrasted with stories of new barriers, notably due to the high workload and the impact of personal protective equipment.
Building on these themes, a map of key changes arising due to the pandemic was developed, highlighting potential opportunities to provide targeted support.
Conclusions: Working on the frontline of a pandemic can have significant implications for healthcare workers, putting them at risk of psychological distress and moral injury, as well as affecting team dynamics. There is striking heterogeneity in the manifestation of these challenges. Team leaders can use the themes and qualitative data from this study to help identify areas for management focus and individual and team support.
Date Issued
2021-12-30
Date Acceptance
2021-11-26
Citation
BMJ Open, 2021, 11 (12), pp.1-13
ISSN
2044-6055
Publisher
BMJ Journals
Start Page
1
End Page
13
Journal / Book Title
BMJ Open
Volume
11
Issue
12
Copyright Statement
© Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2021. Re-use permitted under CC BY-NC. No commercial re-use. See rights and permissions. Published by BMJ. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/
This is an open access article distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution Non Commercial (CC BY-NC 4.0) license, which permits others to distribute, remix, adapt, build upon this work non-commercially, and license their derivative works on different terms, provided the original work is properly cited, appropriate credit is given, any changes made indicated, and the use is non-commercial. See: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/.
This is an open access article distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution Non Commercial (CC BY-NC 4.0) license, which permits others to distribute, remix, adapt, build upon this work non-commercially, and license their derivative works on different terms, provided the original work is properly cited, appropriate credit is given, any changes made indicated, and the use is non-commercial. See: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/.
License URL
Identifier
https://bmjopen.bmj.com/content/11/12/e053680
Subjects
Science & Technology
Life Sciences & Biomedicine
Medicine, General & Internal
General & Internal Medicine
COVID-19
adult intensive & critical care
qualitative research
accident & emergency medicine
health services administration & management
ACUTE RESPIRATORY SYNDROME
PSYCHOLOGICAL IMPACT
NURSES
STRESS
SAFETY
SARS
1103 Clinical Sciences
1117 Public Health and Health Services
1199 Other Medical and Health Sciences
Publication Status
Published
Date Publish Online
2021-12-30