Predictors of positive patient reported outcomes from ‘Early Intervention in Psychosis’ – a national cross-sectional study
File(s)e300716.full.pdf (248.67 KB)
Published version
Author(s)
Type
Journal Article
Abstract
Background
The components of care delivered by Early Intervention in Psychosis (EIP) services vary, but the impact on patient experience is unknown.
Objective
To investigate associations between components of care provided by EIP services in England and patient-reported outcomes.
Methods
2374 patients from EIP services in England were surveyed during the National Clinical Audit of Psychosis. Participants were asked about the care they received, and completed the ‘Patient Global Impressions’ scale (rating whether their mental health had improved), and ‘Friends and Family Test’ (rating whether they would recommend their service). Information about service structure was obtained from service providers. We analysed associations between outcomes and components of care using multilevel regression.
Findings
The majority of participants were likely to recommend the treatment they had received (89.8%), and felt that their mental health had improved (89.0%). Participants from services where care coordinators had larger caseloads were less likely to recommend their care. Participants were more likely to recommend their care if they had been offered cognitive behavioural therapy for psychosis, family therapy or targeted interventions for carers. Participants were more likely to report that their mental health had improved if they had been offered cognitive behavioural therapy for psychosis or targeted interventions for carers.
Conclusions
Specific components of EIP care were associated with improved patient reported outcomes. Psychosocial interventions and carer support may be particularly important in optimising outcomes for patients.
Clinical Implications
These findings emphasise the need for small caseload sizes and comprehensive packages of treatment in EIP services.
The components of care delivered by Early Intervention in Psychosis (EIP) services vary, but the impact on patient experience is unknown.
Objective
To investigate associations between components of care provided by EIP services in England and patient-reported outcomes.
Methods
2374 patients from EIP services in England were surveyed during the National Clinical Audit of Psychosis. Participants were asked about the care they received, and completed the ‘Patient Global Impressions’ scale (rating whether their mental health had improved), and ‘Friends and Family Test’ (rating whether they would recommend their service). Information about service structure was obtained from service providers. We analysed associations between outcomes and components of care using multilevel regression.
Findings
The majority of participants were likely to recommend the treatment they had received (89.8%), and felt that their mental health had improved (89.0%). Participants from services where care coordinators had larger caseloads were less likely to recommend their care. Participants were more likely to recommend their care if they had been offered cognitive behavioural therapy for psychosis, family therapy or targeted interventions for carers. Participants were more likely to report that their mental health had improved if they had been offered cognitive behavioural therapy for psychosis or targeted interventions for carers.
Conclusions
Specific components of EIP care were associated with improved patient reported outcomes. Psychosocial interventions and carer support may be particularly important in optimising outcomes for patients.
Clinical Implications
These findings emphasise the need for small caseload sizes and comprehensive packages of treatment in EIP services.
Date Issued
2023-08-04
Date Acceptance
2023-07-05
Citation
BMJ Mental Health, 2023, 26 (1), pp.1-7
ISSN
2755-9734
Publisher
BMJ Publishing Group
Start Page
1
End Page
7
Journal / Book Title
BMJ Mental Health
Volume
26
Issue
1
Copyright Statement
© Author(s) (or their
employer(s)) 2023. Re-use
permitted under CC BY.
Published by BMJ
employer(s)) 2023. Re-use
permitted under CC BY.
Published by BMJ
License URL
Identifier
https://mentalhealth.bmj.com/content/26/1/e300716
Publication Status
Published
Article Number
e300716
Date Publish Online
2023-08-04