Phenomenological modeling of critical heat flux: The GRAMP code and its validation
File(s)Nuclear Engineering and Design_254_2013.pdf (1.22 MB)
Accepted version
Author(s)
Ahmad, M
Chandraker, DK
Hewitt, GF
Vijayan, PK
Walker, SP
Type
Journal Article
Abstract
Reliable knowledge of the critical heat flux is vital for the design of light water reactors, for both safety and optimization. The use of wholly empirical correlations, or equivalently “Look Up Tables”, can be very effective, but is generally less so in more complex cases, and in particular cases where the heat flux is axially non-uniform. Phenomenological models are in principle more able to take into account of a wider range of conditions, with a less comprehensive coverage of experimental measurements. These models themselves are in part based upon empirical correlations, albeit of the more fundamental individual phenomena occurring, rather than the aggregate behaviour, and as such they too require experimental validation. In this paper we present the basis of a general-purpose phenomenological code, GRAMP, and then use two independent ‘direct’ sets of measurement, from BARC in India and from Harwell in the United Kingdom, and the large dataset embodied in the Look Up Tables, to perform a validation exercise on it. Very good agreement between predictions and experimental measurements is observed, adding to the confidence with which the phenomenological model can be used. Remaining important uncertainties in the phenomenological modeling of CHF, namely the importance of the initial entrained fraction on entry to annular flow, and the influence of the heat flux on entrainment rate, are identified and partially quantified.
Date Issued
2013-01
Citation
Nuclear Engineering and Design, 2013, 254, pp.280-290
ISSN
0029-5493
Publisher
Elsevier
Start Page
280
End Page
290
Journal / Book Title
Nuclear Engineering and Design
Volume
254
Copyright Statement
Copyright © 2013 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved. NOTICE: this is the author’s version of a work that was accepted for publication in Nuclear Engineering and Design. Changes resulting from the publishing process, such as peer review, editing, corrections, structural formatting, and other quality control mechanisms may not be reflected in this document. Changes may have been made to this work since it was submitted for publication. A definitive version was subsequently published in Nuclear Engineering and Design, vol. 254, 2013. DOI:10.1016/j.nucengdes.2012.09.004
Identifier
http://gateway.webofknowledge.com/gateway/Gateway.cgi?GWVersion=2&SrcApp=PARTNER_APP&SrcAuth=LinksAMR&KeyUT=000315002200028&DestLinkType=FullRecord&DestApp=ALL_WOS&UsrCustomerID=1ba7043ffcc86c417c072aa74d649202
Publication Status
Published