Clinical impact of re-evaluating genes and variants implicated in dilated cardiomyopathy
File(s)acceptedVersion (2).zip (1.07 MB)
Accepted version
Author(s)
Type
Journal Article
Abstract
Purpose
Accurate interpretation of variants detected in dilated cardiomyopathy (DCM) is crucial for patient care but has proven challenging. We applied a set of proposed refined American College of Medical Genetics and Genomics/Association for Molecular Pathology (ACMG/AMP) criteria for DCM, reclassified all detected variants in robust genes, and associated these results to patients' phenotype.
Methods
The study included 902 DCM probands from the Maastricht Cardiomyopathy Registry who underwent genetic testing. Two gene panel sizes (extended n = 48; and robust panel n = 14) and two standards of variant classification (standard versus the proposed refined ACMG/AMP criteria) were applied to compare genetic yield.
Results
A pathogenic or likely pathogenic (P/LP) variant was found in 17.8% of patients, and a variant of uncertain significance (VUS) was found in 32.8% of patients when using method 1 (extended panel (n = 48) + standard ACMG/AMP), compared to respectively 16.9% and 12.9% when using method 2 (robust panel (n = 14) + standard ACMG/AMP), and respectively 14% and 14.5% using method 3 (robust panel (n = 14) + refined ACMG/AMP). Patients with P/LP variants had significantly lower event-free survival compared to genotype-negative DCM patients.
Conclusion
Stringent gene selection for DCM genetic testing reduced the number of VUS while retaining ability to detect similar P/LP variants. The number of genes on diagnostic panels should be limited to genes that have the highest signal to noise ratio.
Accurate interpretation of variants detected in dilated cardiomyopathy (DCM) is crucial for patient care but has proven challenging. We applied a set of proposed refined American College of Medical Genetics and Genomics/Association for Molecular Pathology (ACMG/AMP) criteria for DCM, reclassified all detected variants in robust genes, and associated these results to patients' phenotype.
Methods
The study included 902 DCM probands from the Maastricht Cardiomyopathy Registry who underwent genetic testing. Two gene panel sizes (extended n = 48; and robust panel n = 14) and two standards of variant classification (standard versus the proposed refined ACMG/AMP criteria) were applied to compare genetic yield.
Results
A pathogenic or likely pathogenic (P/LP) variant was found in 17.8% of patients, and a variant of uncertain significance (VUS) was found in 32.8% of patients when using method 1 (extended panel (n = 48) + standard ACMG/AMP), compared to respectively 16.9% and 12.9% when using method 2 (robust panel (n = 14) + standard ACMG/AMP), and respectively 14% and 14.5% using method 3 (robust panel (n = 14) + refined ACMG/AMP). Patients with P/LP variants had significantly lower event-free survival compared to genotype-negative DCM patients.
Conclusion
Stringent gene selection for DCM genetic testing reduced the number of VUS while retaining ability to detect similar P/LP variants. The number of genes on diagnostic panels should be limited to genes that have the highest signal to noise ratio.
Date Issued
2021-11-01
Date Acceptance
2021-06-10
Citation
Genetics in Medicine, 2021, 23 (11), pp.2186-2193
ISSN
1098-3600
Publisher
American College of Medical Genetics and Genomics
Start Page
2186
End Page
2193
Journal / Book Title
Genetics in Medicine
Volume
23
Issue
11
Copyright Statement
© 2021, The Author(s), under exclusive licence to the American College of Medical Genetics and Genomics. Published by Springer Nature.
Sponsor
Wellcome Trust
British Heart Foundation
Identifier
http://gateway.webofknowledge.com/gateway/Gateway.cgi?GWVersion=2&SrcApp=PARTNER_APP&SrcAuth=LinksAMR&KeyUT=WOS:000668437200002&DestLinkType=FullRecord&DestApp=ALL_WOS&UsrCustomerID=1ba7043ffcc86c417c072aa74d649202
Grant Number
107469/Z/15/Z
RE/18/4/34215
Subjects
Science & Technology
Life Sciences & Biomedicine
Genetics & Heredity
MEDICAL GENETICS
AMERICAN-COLLEGE
RECOMMENDATIONS
STATEMENT
UPDATE
Publication Status
Published
Date Publish Online
2021-06-30