Impact of integrating pharmacists into primary care teams on health systems indicators: a systematic review
File(s)
Author(s)
Type
Journal Article
Abstract
Background: Evidence suggests that pharmacists integrated in primary care can improve patient outcomes and satisfaction, but their impact on healthcare systems is unclear.
Aim: To identify key impacts of integration of pharmacists in primary care on health system indicators such as healthcare utilisation and costs.
Design and setting: A systematic review of literature.
Method: We examined EMBASE, MEDLINE, SCOPUS, HMIC, CINAHL and CENTRAL, and reference lists of relevant studies. RCTs and observational studies were included, published up to June 2018, which considered health system outcomes of integration of pharmacists in primary care. Risk of bias assessment used the Cochrane Risk of Bias Quality Assessment tool for RCTs, and the NIH National Heart, Lung and Blood Institute quality assessment tool for observational studies. Data were extracted from published reports and findings synthesized.
Results: Searches identified 3,058 studies; 28 met the inclusion criteria. Most included studies were of fair quality. Pharmacists in primary care resulted in reduced use of GP appointments and reduced emergency department attendance, but increased overall primary care use. There was no impact on hospitalisations, but some evidence of savings in overall health system costs and medication costs.
Conclusion: Integration of pharmacists in primary care may reduce GP workload, as well emergency department use. Further higher quality studies are needed, including research to clarify cost-effectiveness and long-term impact on health system outcomes.
Aim: To identify key impacts of integration of pharmacists in primary care on health system indicators such as healthcare utilisation and costs.
Design and setting: A systematic review of literature.
Method: We examined EMBASE, MEDLINE, SCOPUS, HMIC, CINAHL and CENTRAL, and reference lists of relevant studies. RCTs and observational studies were included, published up to June 2018, which considered health system outcomes of integration of pharmacists in primary care. Risk of bias assessment used the Cochrane Risk of Bias Quality Assessment tool for RCTs, and the NIH National Heart, Lung and Blood Institute quality assessment tool for observational studies. Data were extracted from published reports and findings synthesized.
Results: Searches identified 3,058 studies; 28 met the inclusion criteria. Most included studies were of fair quality. Pharmacists in primary care resulted in reduced use of GP appointments and reduced emergency department attendance, but increased overall primary care use. There was no impact on hospitalisations, but some evidence of savings in overall health system costs and medication costs.
Conclusion: Integration of pharmacists in primary care may reduce GP workload, as well emergency department use. Further higher quality studies are needed, including research to clarify cost-effectiveness and long-term impact on health system outcomes.
Date Issued
2019-10
Date Acceptance
2019-04-18
Citation
British Journal of General Practice, 2019, 69 (687), pp.e665-e674
ISSN
0960-1643
Publisher
Royal College of General Practitioners
Start Page
e665
End Page
e674
Journal / Book Title
British Journal of General Practice
Volume
69
Issue
687
Copyright Statement
© British Journal of General Practice 2019.
Subjects
Science & Technology
Life Sciences & Biomedicine
Primary Health Care
Medicine, General & Internal
General & Internal Medicine
family practice
general practice
pharmacists
primary health care
workload
RANDOMIZED CONTROLLED-TRIAL
GENERAL-PRACTICE CLINICS
COST-EFFECTIVENESS
CARDIOVASCULAR RISK
ADDING PHARMACISTS
COLLABORATIVE CARE
OLDER-ADULTS
INTERVENTION
MANAGEMENT
OUTCOMES
family practice
general practice
pharmacists
primary health care
workload
1117 Public Health and Health Services
Public Health
Publication Status
Published
Date Publish Online
2019-09-26