The use of deep venous stenting for acute venous thrombosis of the lower limb
File(s)SARS Stenting in Acute DVT.docx (19.13 KB)
Accepted version
Author(s)
TAHA
BUSUTTIL
Bootun, R
DAVIES, A
Type
Conference Paper
Abstract
Introduction: Venous stenting following successful acute DVT thrombolysis
is thought to reduce recurrence rates and the rates of post thrombotic syndrome (PTS).The aim of this review is to evaluate venous stent patency and the impact on the development of PTS, recurrence, quality of life(QOL) and optimal post-procedural anticoagulation regimen in acute iliofemoral DVT treatment.
Method: EMBASE and Medline databases were interrogated to identify studies in which patients with acuteDVT where stented. The inclusion criteria were; RCTs for acute venous stenting, case serieswithmore than 5 patients, and studies published in English or Arabic.
Result: 760 articles were identified and following title, abstract and full text
screening, 27 articles were included. This included 542 patients stented following thrombolysis. Primary, assisted primary and secondary patency rates 12 months after stent placement ranged from 74-95%,90-95% and 84-100% respectively. Recurrence rates from 3 RCTs(n=213) showed a statistically significant difference in short-term follow-up favouring stenting, with lower recurrence rates of DVT mean numbers(P=0.002). PTS was assessed in most studies with an overall observed rate of 14.6% The incidence of stent re-thrombosis (n=542) was 7.9%. In 26% of studies, patients received additional antiplatelet therapy. QOL questionnaires were only employed in 11.1% of studies demonstrating an improvement in CIVIQ (22.67±3.01 vs 39.34±6.66) between test and control groups.
Conclusion: Venous stenting appears to be an effective adjunct to early
thrombus removal, lowering recurrence and PTS rates. Further studies are
needed to identify optimal anticoagulant regimen and to look at the effect of
interventional therapy on longterm QOL. Take-home message: Venous stenting appears to be an effective procedure in the context of acute lower limb DVT management, as well as lowering recurrence and PTS rates.
is thought to reduce recurrence rates and the rates of post thrombotic syndrome (PTS).The aim of this review is to evaluate venous stent patency and the impact on the development of PTS, recurrence, quality of life(QOL) and optimal post-procedural anticoagulation regimen in acute iliofemoral DVT treatment.
Method: EMBASE and Medline databases were interrogated to identify studies in which patients with acuteDVT where stented. The inclusion criteria were; RCTs for acute venous stenting, case serieswithmore than 5 patients, and studies published in English or Arabic.
Result: 760 articles were identified and following title, abstract and full text
screening, 27 articles were included. This included 542 patients stented following thrombolysis. Primary, assisted primary and secondary patency rates 12 months after stent placement ranged from 74-95%,90-95% and 84-100% respectively. Recurrence rates from 3 RCTs(n=213) showed a statistically significant difference in short-term follow-up favouring stenting, with lower recurrence rates of DVT mean numbers(P=0.002). PTS was assessed in most studies with an overall observed rate of 14.6% The incidence of stent re-thrombosis (n=542) was 7.9%. In 26% of studies, patients received additional antiplatelet therapy. QOL questionnaires were only employed in 11.1% of studies demonstrating an improvement in CIVIQ (22.67±3.01 vs 39.34±6.66) between test and control groups.
Conclusion: Venous stenting appears to be an effective adjunct to early
thrombus removal, lowering recurrence and PTS rates. Further studies are
needed to identify optimal anticoagulant regimen and to look at the effect of
interventional therapy on longterm QOL. Take-home message: Venous stenting appears to be an effective procedure in the context of acute lower limb DVT management, as well as lowering recurrence and PTS rates.
Date Issued
2017-04-06
Date Acceptance
2017-01-18
Citation
British Journal of Surgery, 2017, 104 (S3), pp.11-11
ISSN
1365-2168
Publisher
Wiley
Start Page
11
End Page
11
Journal / Book Title
British Journal of Surgery
Volume
104
Issue
S3
Copyright Statement
© 2017 The Authors. BJS © 2017 BJS Society Ltd. This is the accepted version of the following article: (2017), Issue Information. Br J Surg, 104: 1–4. doi:10.1002/bjs.10529, which has been published in final form at: https://dx.doi.org/10.1002/bjs.10531
Source
Society for Academic and Research Surgery (SARS)
Subjects
Surgery
11 Medical And Health Sciences
Publication Status
Published
Start Date
2017-01-18
Finish Date
2017-01-19
Coverage Spatial
Dublin, Republic of Ireland