On the role of dynamic stress concentrations and fracture mechanics in the longitudinal tensile failure of fibre-reinforced composites
File(s)Strength_model__paper.pdf (5.26 MB)
Accepted version
Author(s)
Bullegas, Gianmaria
Moledo Lamela, Jorge
Pimenta, Soraia
Pinho, Silvestre Taveira
Type
Journal Article
Abstract
This paper investigates the role of dynamic stress concentrations, and of fracture mechanics-driven growth of critical clusters of fibres, on the longitudinal tensile failure of fibre-reinforced composites. For this purpose, we developed a semi-analytical fibre bundle model to simulate the longitudinal tensile failure of large composite bundles of continuous fibres. The model uses shear-lag to calculate the stress recovery along broken fibres, and an efficient field superposition method to calculate the stress concentration on the intact fibres, which has been validated against analytical and Finite Element (FE) results from the literature.
The baseline version of the model uses static equilibrium stress states, and considers fibre failure driven by strength of materials (stress overload) as the only damage theory which can drive bundle failure. Like other models in the literature, the baseline model fails to capture the correct size effect (decreasing composite strength with bundle size) shown by experimental results.
Two model variants have been developed which include dynamics stress concentrations and a fracture mechanics failure criterion respectively. To the knowledge of the authors, it is the first attempt in the literature to investigate these two effects in a fibre bundle model by direct simulation of large composite bundles. It is shown that, although the dynamic stress concentration significantly decreases the predicted bundle strength, it does not allow to predict the correct trend of the size effect. Finally, the results suggest that fracture mechanics may be the physical mechanism which is necessary to include to correctly predict the decreasing composite strength with bundle size shown by experimental results.
The baseline version of the model uses static equilibrium stress states, and considers fibre failure driven by strength of materials (stress overload) as the only damage theory which can drive bundle failure. Like other models in the literature, the baseline model fails to capture the correct size effect (decreasing composite strength with bundle size) shown by experimental results.
Two model variants have been developed which include dynamics stress concentrations and a fracture mechanics failure criterion respectively. To the knowledge of the authors, it is the first attempt in the literature to investigate these two effects in a fibre bundle model by direct simulation of large composite bundles. It is shown that, although the dynamic stress concentration significantly decreases the predicted bundle strength, it does not allow to predict the correct trend of the size effect. Finally, the results suggest that fracture mechanics may be the physical mechanism which is necessary to include to correctly predict the decreasing composite strength with bundle size shown by experimental results.
Date Issued
2020-04-01
Date Acceptance
2020-01-28
Citation
Engineering Fracture Mechanics, 2020, 228, pp.1-31
ISSN
0013-7944
Publisher
Elsevier
Start Page
1
End Page
31
Journal / Book Title
Engineering Fracture Mechanics
Volume
228
Copyright Statement
© 2020 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved. This manuscript is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International Licence http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/
Sponsor
Engineering & Physical Science Research Council (EPSRC)
Identifier
http://gateway.webofknowledge.com/gateway/Gateway.cgi?GWVersion=2&SrcApp=PARTNER_APP&SrcAuth=LinksAMR&KeyUT=WOS:000517397300027&DestLinkType=FullRecord&DestApp=ALL_WOS&UsrCustomerID=1ba7043ffcc86c417c072aa74d649202
Grant Number
EP/M002500/1
Subjects
Science & Technology
Technology
Mechanics
Fibre composites
Longitudinal tensile strength
Fracture mechanics
Stress concentrations
Micro-mechanics
Size effects
SHEAR-LAG MODEL
BUNDLES PROBABILITY MODEL
CARBON-FIBERS
FIBROUS MATERIALS
STRENGTH MODELS
GRAPHITE FIBERS
MATRIX
STATISTICS
SIMULATION
TOUGHNESS
Publication Status
Published online
Article Number
ARTN 106920
Date Publish Online
2020-02-20