A fully coupled fluid-structure interaction model for patient-specific analysis of bioprosthetic aortic valve haemodynamics
File(s)
Published version
Author(s)
Type
Journal Article
Abstract
Background: Bioprosthetic aortic valves (BPAV) have been increasingly used for surgical aortic valve replacement (SAVR), but long-term complications associated with structural valve deterioration remain a concern. The structural behaviour of the valve and its surrounding haemodynamics play a key role in the long-term outcome of SAVR, and these can be quantitively analysed by means of fluid-structure interaction (FSI) simulation. The aim of this study was to develop a fully coupled FSI model for patient-specific analysis of BPAV haemodynamics.
Methods: Using the Edwards Magna Ease valve as an example, the workflow included reconstruction of the aortic root from CT images and the creation of valve geometric model based on available measurements made on the device. Two-way fully coupled FSI simulations were performed under patient-specific flow conditions derived from 4D flow magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), the latter also provided data for model validation.
Results: The simulation results were in good agreement with haemodynamic features extracted from 4D flow MRI and relevant data in the literature. Furthermore, the FSI model provided additional information that cannot be measured in vivo, including wall shear stress and its derivatives on the valve leaflets and in the aortic root.
Conclusion: The FSI workflow presented in this study offers a promising tool for patient-specific assessment of aortic valve haemodynamics, and the results may help elucidate the role of haemodynamics in structural valve deterioration.
Methods: Using the Edwards Magna Ease valve as an example, the workflow included reconstruction of the aortic root from CT images and the creation of valve geometric model based on available measurements made on the device. Two-way fully coupled FSI simulations were performed under patient-specific flow conditions derived from 4D flow magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), the latter also provided data for model validation.
Results: The simulation results were in good agreement with haemodynamic features extracted from 4D flow MRI and relevant data in the literature. Furthermore, the FSI model provided additional information that cannot be measured in vivo, including wall shear stress and its derivatives on the valve leaflets and in the aortic root.
Conclusion: The FSI workflow presented in this study offers a promising tool for patient-specific assessment of aortic valve haemodynamics, and the results may help elucidate the role of haemodynamics in structural valve deterioration.
Date Issued
2025-05-29
Date Acceptance
2025-05-15
Citation
Frontiers in Bioengineering and Biotechnology, 2025, 13
ISSN
2296-4185
Publisher
Frontiers Media S.A.
Journal / Book Title
Frontiers in Bioengineering and Biotechnology
Volume
13
Copyright Statement
© 2025 Yin, Armour, Pirola, Kandail, Kan, Garg, Li, Bahrami, Mirsadraee and Xu. This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
License URL
Identifier
10.3389/fbioe.2025.1584509
Subjects
bioprosthetic aortic valve
fluid-structure interaction
4D flow
haemodynamics
wall shear stress
Publication Status
Published
Article Number
1584509
Date Publish Online
2025-05-29