An evaluation of a multidisciplinary care planning tool for people with intellectual disabilities and behaviours of concern
Author(s)
Type
Journal Article
Abstract
Background
Multidisciplinary care planning for people with intellectual disabilities who engage in behaviours of concern (BoC) is challenging and complex. Effective collaborative understanding and action planning across all stakeholders is essential. Cornwall’s Adult Community Learning Disability Team developed a care planning tool (Connect Behaviour) using contemporary evidence and best practice. Connect Behaviour is designed to facilitate care planning by collaborative and enhanced shared understanding and is also available as an interactive web-based tool.
Aim
To evaluate Connect behaviour using stakeholders’ experiences.
Methods
Family members, care providers, advocates, social workers and professionals who had attended meetings guided by the Connect Behaviour care planning tool in a 3-month period were interviewed about their experiences of those meetings. This was interpreted using inductive thematic analysis.
Results
Of 71 individuals identified as meeting this criterion of inclusion 61 were contactable and 27 consented to participation. These participants consisted of 17 health professionals, two parents, two social workers, three advocates, two positive behaviour support advisors within care providers, and one manager of a local care provider. The thematic analysis of participant views of connect behaviour generated five superordinate themes of ‘pragmatic’, ‘enabling’, ‘validation of effort’, ‘perceived lack of flexibility’ and ‘areas for development’. Further inquiry of themes highlighted subthemes of Connect Behaviour being ‘sensible’, ‘practical’, ‘collaborative’, ‘holistic’ and ‘action’. Conversely, some perceived a lack of flexibility in the care planning tool. Future areas for development were also identified in the data. Changes were recommended to increase the tool accessibility for people with intellectual disabilities, support stakeholders understanding of the tool, and consider utility for other clinical scenarios.
Conclusions
The evaluation established general feedback to continue to use the Connect Behaviour as a care planning tool. The benefits of Connect Behaviour in comparison to other care planning frameworks needs to be understood.
Multidisciplinary care planning for people with intellectual disabilities who engage in behaviours of concern (BoC) is challenging and complex. Effective collaborative understanding and action planning across all stakeholders is essential. Cornwall’s Adult Community Learning Disability Team developed a care planning tool (Connect Behaviour) using contemporary evidence and best practice. Connect Behaviour is designed to facilitate care planning by collaborative and enhanced shared understanding and is also available as an interactive web-based tool.
Aim
To evaluate Connect behaviour using stakeholders’ experiences.
Methods
Family members, care providers, advocates, social workers and professionals who had attended meetings guided by the Connect Behaviour care planning tool in a 3-month period were interviewed about their experiences of those meetings. This was interpreted using inductive thematic analysis.
Results
Of 71 individuals identified as meeting this criterion of inclusion 61 were contactable and 27 consented to participation. These participants consisted of 17 health professionals, two parents, two social workers, three advocates, two positive behaviour support advisors within care providers, and one manager of a local care provider. The thematic analysis of participant views of connect behaviour generated five superordinate themes of ‘pragmatic’, ‘enabling’, ‘validation of effort’, ‘perceived lack of flexibility’ and ‘areas for development’. Further inquiry of themes highlighted subthemes of Connect Behaviour being ‘sensible’, ‘practical’, ‘collaborative’, ‘holistic’ and ‘action’. Conversely, some perceived a lack of flexibility in the care planning tool. Future areas for development were also identified in the data. Changes were recommended to increase the tool accessibility for people with intellectual disabilities, support stakeholders understanding of the tool, and consider utility for other clinical scenarios.
Conclusions
The evaluation established general feedback to continue to use the Connect Behaviour as a care planning tool. The benefits of Connect Behaviour in comparison to other care planning frameworks needs to be understood.
Date Issued
2025-06-01
Date Acceptance
2024-11-01
Citation
International Journal of Social Psychiatry, 2025, 71 (4), pp.655-669
ISSN
0020-7640
Publisher
SAGE Publications
Start Page
655
End Page
669
Journal / Book Title
International Journal of Social Psychiatry
Volume
71
Issue
4
Copyright Statement
© The Author(s) 2024.
Creative Commons License (CC BY 4.0)
This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) which permits any use, reproduction and distribution of the work without further permission provided the original work is attributed as specified on the SAGE and Open Access pages (https://us.sagepub.com/en-us/nam/open-access-at-sage).
Creative Commons License (CC BY 4.0)
This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) which permits any use, reproduction and distribution of the work without further permission provided the original work is attributed as specified on the SAGE and Open Access pages (https://us.sagepub.com/en-us/nam/open-access-at-sage).
License URL
Identifier
https://doi.org/10.1177/00207640241299395
Subjects
Challenging behaviour
care planning
Intellectual disability
multi-agency
Publication Status
Published
Date Publish Online
2024-11-29