Atopic dermatitis or eczema? Consequences of ambiguity in disease name for biomedical literature mining
Author(s)
Frainay, Clement
Pitarch, Yoann
Filippi, Sarah
Evangelou, Marina
Custovic, Adnan
Type
Journal Article
Abstract
Background
Biomedical research increasingly relies on computational approaches to extract relevant information from large corpora of publications.
Objective
To investigate the consequence of the ambiguity between the use of terms “Eczema” and “Atopic Dermatitis” (AD) from the Information Retrieval perspective, and its impact on meta-analyses, systematic reviews and text mining.
Methods
Articles were retrieved by querying the PubMed using terms ‘eczema’ (D003876) and “dermatitis, atopic” (D004485). We used machine learning to investigate the differences between the contexts in which each term is used. We used a decision tree approach and trained model to predict if an article would be indexed with eczema or AD tags. We used text-mining tools to extract biological entities associated with eczema and AD, and investigated the discrepancy regarding the retrieval of key findings according to the terminology used.
Results
Atopic dermatitis query yielded more articles related to veterinary science, biochemistry, cellular and molecular biology; the eczema query linked to public health, infectious disease and respiratory system. Medical Subject Headings terms associated with “AD” or “Eczema” differed, with an agreement between the top 40 lists of 52%. The presence of terms related to cellular mechanisms, especially allergies and inflammation, characterized AD literature. The metabolites mentioned more frequently than expected in articles with AD tag differed from those indexed with eczema. Fewer enriched genes were retrieved when using eczema compared to AD query.
Conclusions and Clinical Relevance
There is a considerable discrepancy when using text mining to extract bio-entities related to eczema or AD. Our results suggest that any systematic approach (particularly when looking for metabolites or genes related to the condition) should be performed using both terms jointly. We propose to use decision tree learning as a tool to spot and characterize ambiguity, and provide the source code for disambiguation at https://github.com/cfrainay/ResearchCodeBase.
Biomedical research increasingly relies on computational approaches to extract relevant information from large corpora of publications.
Objective
To investigate the consequence of the ambiguity between the use of terms “Eczema” and “Atopic Dermatitis” (AD) from the Information Retrieval perspective, and its impact on meta-analyses, systematic reviews and text mining.
Methods
Articles were retrieved by querying the PubMed using terms ‘eczema’ (D003876) and “dermatitis, atopic” (D004485). We used machine learning to investigate the differences between the contexts in which each term is used. We used a decision tree approach and trained model to predict if an article would be indexed with eczema or AD tags. We used text-mining tools to extract biological entities associated with eczema and AD, and investigated the discrepancy regarding the retrieval of key findings according to the terminology used.
Results
Atopic dermatitis query yielded more articles related to veterinary science, biochemistry, cellular and molecular biology; the eczema query linked to public health, infectious disease and respiratory system. Medical Subject Headings terms associated with “AD” or “Eczema” differed, with an agreement between the top 40 lists of 52%. The presence of terms related to cellular mechanisms, especially allergies and inflammation, characterized AD literature. The metabolites mentioned more frequently than expected in articles with AD tag differed from those indexed with eczema. Fewer enriched genes were retrieved when using eczema compared to AD query.
Conclusions and Clinical Relevance
There is a considerable discrepancy when using text mining to extract bio-entities related to eczema or AD. Our results suggest that any systematic approach (particularly when looking for metabolites or genes related to the condition) should be performed using both terms jointly. We propose to use decision tree learning as a tool to spot and characterize ambiguity, and provide the source code for disambiguation at https://github.com/cfrainay/ResearchCodeBase.
Date Issued
2021-07-24
Date Acceptance
2021-06-30
Citation
Clinical and Experimental Allergy, 2021, 51 (9), pp.1185-1194
ISSN
0954-7894
Publisher
Wiley
Start Page
1185
End Page
1194
Journal / Book Title
Clinical and Experimental Allergy
Volume
51
Issue
9
Copyright Statement
© 2021 The Authors. Clinical & Experimental Allergy published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd.
This is an open access article under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
This is an open access article under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
License URL
Identifier
http://gateway.webofknowledge.com/gateway/Gateway.cgi?GWVersion=2&SrcApp=PARTNER_APP&SrcAuth=LinksAMR&KeyUT=WOS:000677205900001&DestLinkType=FullRecord&DestApp=ALL_WOS&UsrCustomerID=1ba7043ffcc86c417c072aa74d649202
Subjects
Science & Technology
Life Sciences & Biomedicine
Allergy
Immunology
atopic dermatitis
eczema
information retrieval
medical terminology
text mining
REVISED NOMENCLATURE
ALLERGY
GENES
TEXT
Publication Status
Published