Repository logo
  • Log In
    Log in via Symplectic to deposit your publication(s).
Repository logo
  • Communities & Collections
  • Research Outputs
  • Statistics
  • Log In
    Log in via Symplectic to deposit your publication(s).
  1. Home
  2. Faculty of Medicine
  3. School of Public Health
  4. School of Public Health
  5. Economic evaluations of human schistosomiasis interventions: a systematic review and identification of associated research needs
 
  • Details
Economic evaluations of human schistosomiasis interventions: a systematic review and identification of associated research needs
File(s)
d10cb088-2c31-4a6a-91d8-b9eb094aa35e_15754_-_hugo_turner_v2.pdf (2.37 MB)
Published version
OA Location
https://wellcomeopenresearch.org/articles/5-45/v2
Author(s)
Turner, Hugo C
French, Michael D
Montresor, Antonio
King, Charles H
Rollinson, David
more
Type
Journal Article
Abstract
Background: Schistosomiasis is one of the most prevalent neglected tropical diseases (NTDs) with an estimated 229 million people requiring preventive treatment worldwide. Recommendations for preventive chemotherapy strategies have been made by the World Health Organization (WHO) whereby the frequency of treatment is determined by the settings prevalence. Despite recent progress, many countries still need to scale up treatment and important questions remain regarding optimal control strategies. This paper presents a systematic review of the economic evaluations of human schistosomiasis interventions.
Methods: A systematic review of the literature was conducted on 22nd August 2019 using the PubMed (MEDLINE) and ISI Web of Science electronic databases. The focus was economic evaluations of schistosomiasis interventions, such as cost-effectiveness and cost-benefit analyses. No date or language stipulations were applied to the searches.
Results: We identified 53 relevant health economic analyses of schistosomiasis interventions. Most studies related to Schistosoma japonicum followed by S. haematobium. Several studies also included other NTDs. In Africa, most studies evaluated preventive chemotherapy, whereas in China they mostly evaluated programmes using a combination of interventions (such as chemotherapy, snail control and health education). There was wide variation in the methodology and epidemiological settings investigated. A range of effectiveness metrics were used by the different studies.
Conclusions: Due to the variation across the identified studies, it was not possible to make definitive policy recommendations. Although, in general, the current WHO recommended preventive chemotherapy approach to control schistosomiasis was found to be cost-effective. This finding has important implications for policymakers, advocacy groups and potential funders. However, there are several important inconsistencies and research gaps (such as how the health benefits of interventions are quantified) that need to be addressed to identify the resources required to achieve schistosomiasis control and elimination.
Date Issued
2020-08-07
Date Acceptance
2020-03-01
Citation
Wellcome Open Research, 2020, 5 (45), pp.1-28
URI
http://hdl.handle.net/10044/1/81679
URL
https://wellcomeopenresearch.org/articles/5-45/v2
DOI
https://www.dx.doi.org/10.12688/wellcomeopenres.15754.2
ISSN
2398-502X
Publisher
F1000Research
Start Page
1
End Page
28
Journal / Book Title
Wellcome Open Research
Volume
5
Issue
45
Copyright Statement
© 2020 Turner HC et al. This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
License URL
http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
Identifier
https://wellcomeopenresearch.org/articles/5-45/v2
Publication Status
Published online
Date Publish Online
2020-08-07
About
Spiral Depositing with Spiral Publishing with Spiral Symplectic
Contact us
Open access team Report an issue
Other Services
Scholarly Communications Library Services
logo

Imperial College London

South Kensington Campus

London SW7 2AZ, UK

tel: +44 (0)20 7589 5111

Accessibility Modern slavery statement Cookie Policy

Built with DSpace-CRIS software - Extension maintained and optimized by 4Science

  • Cookie settings
  • Privacy policy
  • End User Agreement
  • Send Feedback