Repository logo
  • Log In
    Log in via Symplectic to deposit your publication(s).
Repository logo
  • Communities & Collections
  • Research Outputs
  • Statistics
  • Log In
    Log in via Symplectic to deposit your publication(s).
  1. Home
  2. Faculty of Engineering
  3. Earth Science and Engineering
  4. Earth Science and Engineering
  5. Trapping and remobilization during geological CO2 storage: a pore-scale imaging and modeling study
 
  • Details
Trapping and remobilization during geological CO2 storage: a pore-scale imaging and modeling study
File(s)
1-s2.0-S0309170825002064-main.pdf (8.08 MB)
Published version
OA Location
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.advwatres.2025.105092
Author(s)
Moghadasi, Ramin
Foroughi, Sajjad
Goodarzi, Sepideh
Zhang, Yihuai
Bijeljic, Branko
more
Type
Journal Article
Abstract
CO2 storage in geological formations is important in the reduction of CO2 emissions. Residual trapping – CO2 immobilized by capillary forces – contributes significantly to the overall storage. Earlier findings at field conditions have indicated a delayed remobilization – a safety enhancing phenomenon – of residually trapped CO2 under pressure depletion. The present study investigates the underlying processes of this phenomenon by means of detailed pore-level analysis. We first compare our pore network model predictions against experimental data from high-resolution 3D X-ray imaging. General agreement is found, and in both the experiment and the model, remobilization occurs at a higher saturation value – called the critical saturation (Sgc) – than the residual saturation (Sgr). A significant reduction in the relative permeability of the gas is also predicted. The model is then applied to different rocks. The results show that the Sgc is not a simple function of porosity, permeability or residual saturation. Instead, complex pore scale phenomena related to pore connectivity govern the behavior and case-specific studies are required to determine the exact value. For practical purposes, the difference between residual saturation and critical saturation is approximately between 2–4%. The reduction in gas relative permeability varies between 60–90 % compared to that for drainage with no expansion.
Date Issued
2025-11-01
Date Acceptance
2025-08-20
Citation
Advances in Water Resources, 2025, 205
URI
https://hdl.handle.net/10044/1/126151
URL
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.advwatres.2025.105092
DOI
10.1016/j.advwatres.2025.105092
ISSN
0309-1708
Publisher
Elsevier
Journal / Book Title
Advances in Water Resources
Volume
205
Copyright Statement
© 2025 The Authors. Published by Elsevier Ltd. This is an open access article under the CC BY license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
License URL
http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
Identifier
10.1016/j.advwatres.2025.105092
Subjects
BRINE EXTRACTION
CARBON-DIOXIDE STORAGE
CONTACT-ANGLE
Gas remobilization
Geological CO 2 storage
HYSTERESIS
INJECTION WELL
Physical Sciences
Pore-network modeling
Pore-scale
PRESSURE MANAGEMENT
PROJECT
Residual trapping
SANDSTONE
Science & Technology
Water Resources
WETTABILITY
X-ray microtomography
Publication Status
Published
Article Number
105092
Date Publish Online
2025-08-21
About
Spiral Depositing with Spiral Publishing with Spiral Symplectic
Contact us
Open access team Report an issue
Other Services
Scholarly Communications Library Services
logo

Imperial College London

South Kensington Campus

London SW7 2AZ, UK

tel: +44 (0)20 7589 5111

Accessibility Modern slavery statement Cookie Policy

Built with DSpace-CRIS software - Extension maintained and optimized by 4Science

  • Cookie settings
  • Privacy policy
  • End User Agreement
  • Send Feedback