Design for Behaviour Change as a Driver for Sustainable Innovation: Challenges and Opportunities for Implementation in the Private and Public Sectors
File(s)Neidderer et al (2016) DfBC.pdf (919.09 KB)
Published version
Author(s)
Type
Journal Article
Abstract
Over the last decade, design for behaviour change has become increasingly recognised as a strategy for enabling social change. Despite
this, we are far from understanding its implementation, especially through the private and public sectors. This study has surveyed private
and public sector stakeholders with regard to their current knowledge of, and approach to, design for behaviour change. The aim was
to identify the challenges for professional stakeholders in understanding, accessing and implementing design for behaviour change.
Underpinned by a literature review of design for behaviour change theories and approaches, an online survey and two focus groups with
private and public sector stakeholders were conducted with particular focus on small and medium size enterprises (SMEs). The results
identified that there is a significant disconnect between available theoretical knowledge of design for behaviour change and its practical
implementation. Reasons for this include a lack of awareness and common language, of evidence based examples, and of evaluation
methods and inter-sector collaborations. In response, a set of recommendations has been developed to propose ways forward for the wider
understanding and application of design for behaviour change.
this, we are far from understanding its implementation, especially through the private and public sectors. This study has surveyed private
and public sector stakeholders with regard to their current knowledge of, and approach to, design for behaviour change. The aim was
to identify the challenges for professional stakeholders in understanding, accessing and implementing design for behaviour change.
Underpinned by a literature review of design for behaviour change theories and approaches, an online survey and two focus groups with
private and public sector stakeholders were conducted with particular focus on small and medium size enterprises (SMEs). The results
identified that there is a significant disconnect between available theoretical knowledge of design for behaviour change and its practical
implementation. Reasons for this include a lack of awareness and common language, of evidence based examples, and of evaluation
methods and inter-sector collaborations. In response, a set of recommendations has been developed to propose ways forward for the wider
understanding and application of design for behaviour change.
Date Issued
2016-08-31
Date Acceptance
2016-05-08
Citation
International Journal of Design, 2016, 10 (2), pp.67-85
ISSN
1994-036X
Publisher
International Journal of Design
Start Page
67
End Page
85
Journal / Book Title
International Journal of Design
Volume
10
Issue
2
Copyright Statement
© 2016 Niedderer, Ludden, Clune, Lockton, Mackrill, Morris, Cain,
Gardiner, Evans, Gutteridge, & Hekkert. Copyright for this article is retained by
the authors, with first publication rights granted to the International Journal of
Design. All journal content, except where otherwise noted, is licensed under a
Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs 2.5 License. By virtue
of their appearance in this open-access journal, articles are free to use, with proper
attribution, in educational and other non-commercial settings.
Gardiner, Evans, Gutteridge, & Hekkert. Copyright for this article is retained by
the authors, with first publication rights granted to the International Journal of
Design. All journal content, except where otherwise noted, is licensed under a
Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs 2.5 License. By virtue
of their appearance in this open-access journal, articles are free to use, with proper
attribution, in educational and other non-commercial settings.
Identifier
http://www.ijdesign.org/ojs/index.php/IJDesign/article/view/2260
Subjects
1203 Design Practice And Management
1901 Art Theory And Criticism
Publication Status
Published