The effects of blood cell salvage on transfusion requirements after decannulation from veno-venous extracorporeal membrane oxygenation: an emulated trial analysis
File(s)
Published version
Author(s)
Camarda, Valentina
Sanderson, Barnaby
Barrett, Nicholas A
Collins, Patrick Duncan
Garfield, Benjamin
Type
Journal Article
Abstract
Background
Veno-venous extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (VV-ECMO) is a supportive therapy for acute respiratory failure with increased risk of packed red blood cells (PRBC) transfusion. Blood cell salvage (BCS) aims to reduce blood transfusion, but its efficacy is unclear. This study aimed to estimate the effect of BCS at the time of removal of the ECMO circuit (ECMO decannulation) on PRBC transfused.
Methods
To compare BCS to non-blood cell salvage (n-BCS), we conducted an emulated trial of patients at two ECMO centres in the United Kingdom. We used inverse propensity of treatment weighting to control for confounding and estimated the average treatment effect of BCS on PRBC transfused within two days of decannulation, and on changes in haemoglobin (Hb).
Results
We included 841 patients who underwent VV-ECMO decannulation. The estimated marginal mean number of PRBC transfused when using BCS was 0·2 (95%CI: 0·16, 0·25) units compared to 0·51 (95%CI: 0·44, 0·59) units with n-BCS; an average treatment effect of −0·31 (95%CI: −0·40, −0·22) units. BCS reduced the risk of receiving any PRBC transfusion by 17·1% (95%CI: 11·1%, 22·9%) equating to a number needed to treat for any PRBC transfusion of 6 (95%CI: 5, 9). The difference in expected Hb levels after decannulation between BCS and n-BCS was 5·0 (95%CI: 4·2, 5·8) g/L.
Conclusions
The use of BCS during VV-ECMO decannulation may be an effective strategy to augment haemoglobin levels and reduce PRBC transfusions.
Veno-venous extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (VV-ECMO) is a supportive therapy for acute respiratory failure with increased risk of packed red blood cells (PRBC) transfusion. Blood cell salvage (BCS) aims to reduce blood transfusion, but its efficacy is unclear. This study aimed to estimate the effect of BCS at the time of removal of the ECMO circuit (ECMO decannulation) on PRBC transfused.
Methods
To compare BCS to non-blood cell salvage (n-BCS), we conducted an emulated trial of patients at two ECMO centres in the United Kingdom. We used inverse propensity of treatment weighting to control for confounding and estimated the average treatment effect of BCS on PRBC transfused within two days of decannulation, and on changes in haemoglobin (Hb).
Results
We included 841 patients who underwent VV-ECMO decannulation. The estimated marginal mean number of PRBC transfused when using BCS was 0·2 (95%CI: 0·16, 0·25) units compared to 0·51 (95%CI: 0·44, 0·59) units with n-BCS; an average treatment effect of −0·31 (95%CI: −0·40, −0·22) units. BCS reduced the risk of receiving any PRBC transfusion by 17·1% (95%CI: 11·1%, 22·9%) equating to a number needed to treat for any PRBC transfusion of 6 (95%CI: 5, 9). The difference in expected Hb levels after decannulation between BCS and n-BCS was 5·0 (95%CI: 4·2, 5·8) g/L.
Conclusions
The use of BCS during VV-ECMO decannulation may be an effective strategy to augment haemoglobin levels and reduce PRBC transfusions.
Date Issued
2024-12-05
Date Acceptance
2024-11-15
Citation
Critical Care (UK), 2024, 28
ISSN
1364-8535
Publisher
BMC
Journal / Book Title
Critical Care (UK)
Volume
28
Copyright Statement
© The Author(s) 2024. Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License, which permits any non-commercial use, sharing, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if you modified the licensed material. You do not have permission under this licence to share adapted material derived from this article or parts of it. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/.
Identifier
https://doi.org/10.1186/s13054-024-05177-7
Publication Status
Published
Article Number
403
Date Publish Online
2024-12-05