Hydrolysed formula and risk of allergic or autoimmune disease: a systematic review and meta-analysis
File(s)bmj.i974.full.pdf (1.06 MB)
Published version
Author(s)
Boyle, RJ
Ierodiakonou, D
Garcia-Larsen, V
Type
Journal Article
Abstract
Objective To determine whether feeding infants with hydrolysed formula reduces their risk of allergic or autoimmune disease.
Design Systematic review and meta-analysis, as part of a series of systematic reviews commissioned by the UK Food Standards Agency to inform guidelines on infant feeding. Two authors selected studies by consensus, independently extracted data, and assessed the quality of included studies using the Cochrane risk of bias tool.
Data sources Medline, Embase, Web of Science, CENTRAL, and LILACS searched between January 1946 and April 2015.
Eligibility criteria for selecting studies Prospective intervention trials of hydrolysed cows’ milk formula compared with another hydrolysed formula, human breast milk, or a standard cows’ milk formula, which reported on allergic or autoimmune disease or allergic sensitisation.
Results 37 eligible intervention trials of hydrolysed formula were identified, including over 19 000 participants. There was evidence of conflict of interest and high or unclear risk of bias in most studies of allergic outcomes and evidence of publication bias for studies of eczema and wheeze. Overall there was no consistent evidence that partially or extensively hydrolysed formulas reduce risk of allergic or autoimmune outcomes in infants at high pre-existing risk of these outcomes. Odds ratios for eczema at age 0-4, compared with standard cows’ milk formula, were 0.84 (95% confidence interval 0.67 to 1.07; I2=30%) for partially hydrolysed formula; 0.55 (0.28 to 1.09; I2=74%) for extensively hydrolysed casein based formula; and 1.12 (0.88 to 1.42; I2=0%) for extensively hydrolysed whey based formula. There was no evidence to support the health claim approved by the US Food and Drug Administration that a partially hydrolysed formula could reduce the risk of eczema nor the conclusion of the Cochrane review that hydrolysed formula could allergy to cows’ milk.
Conclusion These findings do not support current guidelines that recommend the use of hydrolysed formula to prevent allergic disease in high risk infants.
Design Systematic review and meta-analysis, as part of a series of systematic reviews commissioned by the UK Food Standards Agency to inform guidelines on infant feeding. Two authors selected studies by consensus, independently extracted data, and assessed the quality of included studies using the Cochrane risk of bias tool.
Data sources Medline, Embase, Web of Science, CENTRAL, and LILACS searched between January 1946 and April 2015.
Eligibility criteria for selecting studies Prospective intervention trials of hydrolysed cows’ milk formula compared with another hydrolysed formula, human breast milk, or a standard cows’ milk formula, which reported on allergic or autoimmune disease or allergic sensitisation.
Results 37 eligible intervention trials of hydrolysed formula were identified, including over 19 000 participants. There was evidence of conflict of interest and high or unclear risk of bias in most studies of allergic outcomes and evidence of publication bias for studies of eczema and wheeze. Overall there was no consistent evidence that partially or extensively hydrolysed formulas reduce risk of allergic or autoimmune outcomes in infants at high pre-existing risk of these outcomes. Odds ratios for eczema at age 0-4, compared with standard cows’ milk formula, were 0.84 (95% confidence interval 0.67 to 1.07; I2=30%) for partially hydrolysed formula; 0.55 (0.28 to 1.09; I2=74%) for extensively hydrolysed casein based formula; and 1.12 (0.88 to 1.42; I2=0%) for extensively hydrolysed whey based formula. There was no evidence to support the health claim approved by the US Food and Drug Administration that a partially hydrolysed formula could reduce the risk of eczema nor the conclusion of the Cochrane review that hydrolysed formula could allergy to cows’ milk.
Conclusion These findings do not support current guidelines that recommend the use of hydrolysed formula to prevent allergic disease in high risk infants.
Date Issued
2016-03-08
Date Acceptance
2016-01-30
Citation
BMJ, 2016, 352 (1)
ISSN
0959-8138
Publisher
BMJ Publishing Group
Journal / Book Title
BMJ
Volume
352
Issue
1
Copyright Statement
© BMJ Publishing Group Ltd 2016. This article is Open Access, published under the terms of a Creative Commons licence. Articles published under CC-BY-NC permit non-commercial use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. Permission only needs to be obtained for commercial use.
License URL
Identifier
https://www.bmj.com/content/352/bmj.i974
Subjects
Science & Technology
Life Sciences & Biomedicine
Medicine, General & Internal
General & Internal Medicine
INFANT NUTRITIONAL INTERVENTION
BETA-CELL AUTOIMMUNITY
FED WHEY HYDROLYSATE
COWS MILK FORMULA
PRIMARY PREVENTION
ATOPIC DISEASE
GENETIC RISK
BREAST-MILK
PROTEIN
EXPOSURE
Autoimmune Diseases
Caseins
Dietary Proteins
Food Hypersensitivity
Humans
Immune Tolerance
Infant
Infant Formula
Infant Nutritional Physiological Phenomena
Infant, Newborn
Prospective Studies
Risk
Humans
Autoimmune Diseases
Food Hypersensitivity
Dietary Proteins
Caseins
Risk
Prospective Studies
Immune Tolerance
Infant Formula
Infant
Infant, Newborn
Infant Nutritional Physiological Phenomena
General & Internal Medicine
1103 Clinical Sciences
1117 Public Health and Health Services
Publication Status
Published
Article Number
i974
Date Publish Online
2016-03-08