Real-world walking cadence in people with COPD
File(s)00673-2023.full.pdf (394.1 KB)
Published version
Author(s)
Type
Journal Article
Abstract
Introduction The clinical validity of real-world walking cadence in people with COPD is unsettled. Our objective was to assess the levels, variability and association with clinically relevant COPD characteristics and outcomes of real-world walking cadence.
Methods We assessed walking cadence (steps per minute during walking bouts longer than 10 s) from 7 days’ accelerometer data in 593 individuals with COPD from five European countries, and clinical and functional characteristics from validated questionnaires and standardised tests. Severe exacerbations during a 12-month follow-up were recorded from patient reports and medical registries.
Results Participants were mostly male (80%) and had mean±sd age of 68±8 years, post-bronchodilator forced expiratory volume in 1 s (FEV1) of 57±19% predicted and walked 6880±3926 steps·day−1. Mean walking cadence was 88±9 steps·min−1, followed a normal distribution and was highly stable within-person (intraclass correlation coefficient 0.92, 95% CI 0.90–0.93). After adjusting for age, sex, height and number of walking bouts in fractional polynomial or linear regressions, walking cadence was positively associated with FEV1, 6-min walk distance, physical activity (steps·day−1, time in moderate-to-vigorous physical activity, vector magnitude units, walking time, intensity during locomotion), physical activity experience and health-related quality of life and negatively associated with breathlessness and depression (all p<0.05). These associations remained after further adjustment for daily steps. In negative binomial regression adjusted for multiple confounders, walking cadence related to lower number of severe exacerbations during follow-up (incidence rate ratio 0.94 per step·min−1, 95% CI 0.91–0.99, p=0.009).
Conclusions Higher real-world walking cadence is associated with better COPD status and lower severe exacerbations risk, which makes it attractive as a future prognostic marker and clinical outcome.
Methods We assessed walking cadence (steps per minute during walking bouts longer than 10 s) from 7 days’ accelerometer data in 593 individuals with COPD from five European countries, and clinical and functional characteristics from validated questionnaires and standardised tests. Severe exacerbations during a 12-month follow-up were recorded from patient reports and medical registries.
Results Participants were mostly male (80%) and had mean±sd age of 68±8 years, post-bronchodilator forced expiratory volume in 1 s (FEV1) of 57±19% predicted and walked 6880±3926 steps·day−1. Mean walking cadence was 88±9 steps·min−1, followed a normal distribution and was highly stable within-person (intraclass correlation coefficient 0.92, 95% CI 0.90–0.93). After adjusting for age, sex, height and number of walking bouts in fractional polynomial or linear regressions, walking cadence was positively associated with FEV1, 6-min walk distance, physical activity (steps·day−1, time in moderate-to-vigorous physical activity, vector magnitude units, walking time, intensity during locomotion), physical activity experience and health-related quality of life and negatively associated with breathlessness and depression (all p<0.05). These associations remained after further adjustment for daily steps. In negative binomial regression adjusted for multiple confounders, walking cadence related to lower number of severe exacerbations during follow-up (incidence rate ratio 0.94 per step·min−1, 95% CI 0.91–0.99, p=0.009).
Conclusions Higher real-world walking cadence is associated with better COPD status and lower severe exacerbations risk, which makes it attractive as a future prognostic marker and clinical outcome.
Date Issued
2024-03-01
Date Acceptance
2023-12-05
Citation
ERJ Open Research, 2024, 10 (2)
ISSN
2312-0541
Publisher
European Respiratory Society
Journal / Book Title
ERJ Open Research
Volume
10
Issue
2
Copyright Statement
Copyright ©The authors 2024
This version is distributed under
the terms of the Creative
Commons Attribution NonCommercial Licence 4.0. For
commercial reproduction rights
and permissions contact
permissions@ersnet.org
This version is distributed under
the terms of the Creative
Commons Attribution NonCommercial Licence 4.0. For
commercial reproduction rights
and permissions contact
permissions@ersnet.org
Identifier
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/38444656
Publication Status
Published
Coverage Spatial
England
Article Number
00673-2023
Date Publish Online
2024-03-04