Identifying and ranking causal biochemical biomarkers for breast cancer: a Mendelian randomisation study
File(s)
Published version
Author(s)
Tang, Sonja Ning
Zuber, Verena
Tsilidis, Konstantinos
Type
Journal Article
Abstract
Background:
Only a few of the 34 biochemical biomarkers measured in the UK Biobank (UKB) have been associated with breast cancer, with many associations suffering from possible confounding and reverse causation. This study aimed to screen and rank all UKB biochemical biomarkers for possible causal relationships with breast cancer.
Methods:
We conducted two-sample Mendelian randomisation (MR) analyses on ~420,000 women by leveraging summary-level genetic exposure associations from the UKB study (n = 194,174) and summary-level genetic outcome associations from the Breast Cancer Association Consortium (n = 228,951). Our exposures included all 34 biochemical biomarkers in the UKB, and our outcomes were overall, oestrogen-positive, and oestrogen-negative breast cancer. We performed inverse-variance weighted MR, weighted median MR, MR-Egger, and MR-PRESSO for 30 biomarkers for which we found multiple instrumental variables. We additionally performed multivariable MR to adjust for known risk factors, bidirectional MR to investigate reverse causation, and MR Bayesian model averaging to rank the significant biomarkers by their genetic evidence.
Results:
Increased genetic liability to overall breast cancer was robustly associated with the following biomarkers by decreasing importance: testosterone (odds ratio (OR): 1.12, 95% confidence interval (CI): 1.04–1.21), high-density lipoprotein (HDL) cholesterol (OR: 1.08, 95% CI: 1.04–1.13), insulin-like growth factor 1 (OR: 1.08, 95% CI: 1.02–1.13), and alkaline phosphatase (ALP) (OR: 0.93, 95% CI: 0.89–0.98).
Conclusions
Our findings support a likely causal role of genetically predicted levels of testosterone, HDL cholesterol, and IGF-1, as well as a novel potential role of ALP in breast cancer aetiology. Further studies are needed to understand full disease pathways that may inform breast cancer prevention.
Only a few of the 34 biochemical biomarkers measured in the UK Biobank (UKB) have been associated with breast cancer, with many associations suffering from possible confounding and reverse causation. This study aimed to screen and rank all UKB biochemical biomarkers for possible causal relationships with breast cancer.
Methods:
We conducted two-sample Mendelian randomisation (MR) analyses on ~420,000 women by leveraging summary-level genetic exposure associations from the UKB study (n = 194,174) and summary-level genetic outcome associations from the Breast Cancer Association Consortium (n = 228,951). Our exposures included all 34 biochemical biomarkers in the UKB, and our outcomes were overall, oestrogen-positive, and oestrogen-negative breast cancer. We performed inverse-variance weighted MR, weighted median MR, MR-Egger, and MR-PRESSO for 30 biomarkers for which we found multiple instrumental variables. We additionally performed multivariable MR to adjust for known risk factors, bidirectional MR to investigate reverse causation, and MR Bayesian model averaging to rank the significant biomarkers by their genetic evidence.
Results:
Increased genetic liability to overall breast cancer was robustly associated with the following biomarkers by decreasing importance: testosterone (odds ratio (OR): 1.12, 95% confidence interval (CI): 1.04–1.21), high-density lipoprotein (HDL) cholesterol (OR: 1.08, 95% CI: 1.04–1.13), insulin-like growth factor 1 (OR: 1.08, 95% CI: 1.02–1.13), and alkaline phosphatase (ALP) (OR: 0.93, 95% CI: 0.89–0.98).
Conclusions
Our findings support a likely causal role of genetically predicted levels of testosterone, HDL cholesterol, and IGF-1, as well as a novel potential role of ALP in breast cancer aetiology. Further studies are needed to understand full disease pathways that may inform breast cancer prevention.
Date Issued
2022-11-23
Date Acceptance
2022-11-11
Citation
BMC Medicine, 2022, 20, pp.1-14
ISSN
1741-7015
Publisher
BioMed Central
Start Page
1
End Page
14
Journal / Book Title
BMC Medicine
Volume
20
Copyright Statement
© The Author(s) 2022. This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.
License URL
Identifier
https://bmcmedicine.biomedcentral.com/articles/10.1186/s12916-022-02660-2
Publication Status
Published
Article Number
ARTN 457
Date Publish Online
2022-11-23