Repository logo
  • Log In
    Log in via Symplectic to deposit your publication(s).
Repository logo
  • Communities & Collections
  • Research Outputs
  • Statistics
  • Log In
    Log in via Symplectic to deposit your publication(s).
  1. Home
  2. Faculty of Medicine
  3. Department of Surgery and Cancer
  4. Department of Surgery and Cancer PhD Theses
  5. Optimising the identification of acute deterioration and sepsis through digital technology
 
  • Details
Optimising the identification of acute deterioration and sepsis through digital technology
File(s)
Joshi-M-2020-PhD-Thesis .pdf (28.96 MB)
Thesis
Author(s)
Joshi, Meera
Type
Thesis or dissertation
Abstract
Sepsis is a global health concern with a high mortality. For every hour’s delay in sepsis treatment, mortality increases by 7.6%. Vital sign changes are used to detect alterations in a patient’s physiology and detect deterioration. Novel wearable sensors, which measure vital signs continuously, may identify unwell patients and sepsis sooner. We aimed to determine if such sensors could reliably identify unwell patients and those with sepsis sooner.

A sensor was selected which measures multiple vital signs simultaneously. The sensor measures heart rate, respiratory rate and temperature every 2 minutes. Sensor and nursing ward data were compared, patient data and staff feedback was collected.

A 500-patient study is complete with admitted patients wearing the sensor in additional to standard clinical monitoring. Comparisons between sensor readings and ward observations taken by nurses were made. A comparison of sensor time windows for alert generation was made and the 10 minute window selected. The correlation coefficient between Sensium data and ward observation data for Heart Rate (HR) was 0.79 (p=0.0001) and a mean difference of less than 3 beats per minute. The correlation coefficient between Sensium data and ward observation data for Respiratory Rate (RR) was 0.3 (p=0.0001) and a mean difference of less than 2 breaths per minute. The correlation coefficient between Sensium data and ward observation data for temperature was 0.43 (p=0.0001) and a mean difference of less than 0.5° C. In 82% of cases of HR and 81% of RR the sensor was faster than ward observations in time to detection.
Patient feedback was positive (453 questionnaires analysed) with 86% agreeing to wear the sensor again and 85% agreeing it was comfortable. Staff groups were interviewed; feedback was positive with problems in current monitoring highlighted.

Wearable sensors may cause a paradigm shift in future patient monitoring with safer, smarter wards.
Version
Open Access
Date Issued
2019-12
Date Awarded
2020-10
URI
http://hdl.handle.net/10044/1/97231
DOI
https://doi.org/10.25560/97231
Copyright Statement
Creative Commons Attribution NonCommercial Licence
License URL
http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/
Advisor
Darzi, Ara
Cooke, Graham
Khan, Sadia
Sponsor
Royal College of Surgeons England Research Fellowship
CW Plus
National Institute for Health Research (NIHR)
Imperial Biomedical Research Centre (BRC)
Imperial Patient Safety Translational Research Centre (PSTRC)
Publisher Department
Department of Surgery & Cancer
Publisher Institution
Imperial College London
Qualification Level
Doctoral
Qualification Name
Doctor of Philosophy (PhD)
About
Spiral Depositing with Spiral Publishing with Spiral Symplectic
Contact us
Open access team Report an issue
Other Services
Scholarly Communications Library Services
logo

Imperial College London

South Kensington Campus

London SW7 2AZ, UK

tel: +44 (0)20 7589 5111

Accessibility Modern slavery statement Cookie Policy

Built with DSpace-CRIS software - Extension maintained and optimized by 4Science

  • Cookie settings
  • Privacy policy
  • End User Agreement
  • Send Feedback