Long-term outcomes of Aripiprazole long-acting injectable: a 10-year mirror image study of patient acceptability and treatment effectiveness
File(s) s41537-025-00637-7.pdf (596.1 KB)
Published version
Author(s)
Barnett, Joshua
Pappa, Sofia
Type
Journal Article
Abstract
Relapses are frequent in schizophrenia and other psychotic disorders. While long-acting injectable antipsychotics (LAIs) are effective in preventing hospital admissions and improving adherence and patient outcomes, they are still under-utilised. Furthermore, evidence from newer formulations and longitudinal studies, despite their commonly long-term use, remains limited. To address this scarcity of data, this study aims to evaluate the long-term effectiveness and acceptability of once-monthly Aripiprazole long-acting injectable (ALAI), the only third-generation antipsychotic available in long-acting formulation.
In this pragmatic, independent, ten-year mirror-image study conducted within a large urban mental health service in London, UK, we assessed hospital admission rates and treatment retention over 5 years following ALAI initiation in a naturalistic adult cohort. Frequency and length of hospitalisations in the 5 years pre- and post-initiation were recorded using electronic records, as were discontinuation rates and reasons. Separate analyses were performed comparing outcomes between treatment completers and discontinuers, as well as between those with schizophrenia vs other diagnoses.
In total, 135 patients were included in the study (63% with Schizophrenia, 37% with other diagnoses). The discontinuation rate was 47% at 5 years (23.7%, 13.6%, 7.9%, 7.3% and 5.3% in years 1 to 5 respectively). Among the 53% who completed 5 years of ALAI treatment, we observed an 88.5% reduction in mean number (1.57 to 0.18, p<0.001) and a 90% reduction in mean length of hospitalizations compared to 5 years pre-ALAI initiation (103 to 10 days, p<0.0001). Median admissions and length fell from 1 to 0 and 68 to 0 days (p<0.001), respectively. In contrast, discontinuers (47%) exhibited inferior outcomes and showed only a 29.9% reduction in admissions over 5 years. Patients were more likely to discontinue due to poor compliance and ineffectiveness and rarely due to tolerability issues. Apart from switching to ALAI from another LAI, there were no major clinical or demographic predictors of treatment continuation. Outcomes were consistent independent of diagnosis. Potential confounders however must not be overlooked, such as the exclusion of a large number of patients due to strict eligibility criteria as well as changes to healthcare policy over the study period.
This is the first study to report 5-year hospitalisation and treatment persistence outcomes with ALAI. Its sustained use was associated with substantial reductions in hospital use, with 85% of completers requiring no further admissions, compared to 30% of discontinuers. These real-world findings support the long-term value of ALAI and may help address common barriers to LAI adoption in clinical decision-making.
In this pragmatic, independent, ten-year mirror-image study conducted within a large urban mental health service in London, UK, we assessed hospital admission rates and treatment retention over 5 years following ALAI initiation in a naturalistic adult cohort. Frequency and length of hospitalisations in the 5 years pre- and post-initiation were recorded using electronic records, as were discontinuation rates and reasons. Separate analyses were performed comparing outcomes between treatment completers and discontinuers, as well as between those with schizophrenia vs other diagnoses.
In total, 135 patients were included in the study (63% with Schizophrenia, 37% with other diagnoses). The discontinuation rate was 47% at 5 years (23.7%, 13.6%, 7.9%, 7.3% and 5.3% in years 1 to 5 respectively). Among the 53% who completed 5 years of ALAI treatment, we observed an 88.5% reduction in mean number (1.57 to 0.18, p<0.001) and a 90% reduction in mean length of hospitalizations compared to 5 years pre-ALAI initiation (103 to 10 days, p<0.0001). Median admissions and length fell from 1 to 0 and 68 to 0 days (p<0.001), respectively. In contrast, discontinuers (47%) exhibited inferior outcomes and showed only a 29.9% reduction in admissions over 5 years. Patients were more likely to discontinue due to poor compliance and ineffectiveness and rarely due to tolerability issues. Apart from switching to ALAI from another LAI, there were no major clinical or demographic predictors of treatment continuation. Outcomes were consistent independent of diagnosis. Potential confounders however must not be overlooked, such as the exclusion of a large number of patients due to strict eligibility criteria as well as changes to healthcare policy over the study period.
This is the first study to report 5-year hospitalisation and treatment persistence outcomes with ALAI. Its sustained use was associated with substantial reductions in hospital use, with 85% of completers requiring no further admissions, compared to 30% of discontinuers. These real-world findings support the long-term value of ALAI and may help address common barriers to LAI adoption in clinical decision-making.
Date Issued
2025-06-23
Date Acceptance
2025-06-05
Citation
Schizophrenia, 2025, 11
ISSN
2754-6993
Publisher
Nature Research
Journal / Book Title
Schizophrenia
Volume
11
Copyright Statement
© The Author(s) 2025 Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.
License URL
Identifier
10.1038/s41537-025-00637-7
Publication Status
Published
Article Number
92
Date Publish Online
2025-06-23
