Latent class modelling for pulmonary aspergillosis diagnosis in lung transplant recipients
File(s)NACFC abstract May 2018.pdf (79.52 KB)
Accepted version
Author(s)
Type
Conference Paper
Abstract
Rationale Timely, accurate diagnosis of invasive aspergillosis (IA) is key to enable initiation of antifungal therapy in lung transplantation. Despite promising novel fungal biomarkers, the lack of a diagnostic gold-standard creates difficulty in determining utility.
Objectives This study aimed to use latent class modelling of fungal diagnostics to classify lung transplant recipients (LTR) with IA in a large single centre.
Methods Regression models were used to compare composite biomarker testing of bronchoalveolar lavage to clinical and EORTC-MSG guideline-based diagnosis of IA with mortality used as a surrogate primary outcome measure. Bootstrap analysis identified radiological features associated with IA. Bayesian latent class modelling was used to define IA.
Measurements and Main Results A clinical diagnosis of fungal infection (P =<0.001) and composite biomarker positive Results (P =<0.001) had significantly increased 12 month mortality. There was poor correlation between clinical diagnosis, EORTC-based IA diagnosis and composite biomarker positivity. Tracheobronchitis was positively predictive of a clinical and composite biomarker positive diagnosis of IA (p=0.004;95% CI–1.79–21.28 and p=0.03;95% CI–0.85–15.62 respectively). Latent class modelling resulted in the formation of 3 groups: Class 1: likely fungal infection; Class 2: unlikely fungal infection; Class 3: unclassifiable. A. fumigatus PCR was positive in ∼90% of class 1 LTRs compared to only 1% in class 2. Analysis of mortality showed a trend towards significance comparing class 1 with class 2 (p=0.06;HR–4.7;95% CI(0.91–24)) (figure 1).
Objectives This study aimed to use latent class modelling of fungal diagnostics to classify lung transplant recipients (LTR) with IA in a large single centre.
Methods Regression models were used to compare composite biomarker testing of bronchoalveolar lavage to clinical and EORTC-MSG guideline-based diagnosis of IA with mortality used as a surrogate primary outcome measure. Bootstrap analysis identified radiological features associated with IA. Bayesian latent class modelling was used to define IA.
Measurements and Main Results A clinical diagnosis of fungal infection (P =<0.001) and composite biomarker positive Results (P =<0.001) had significantly increased 12 month mortality. There was poor correlation between clinical diagnosis, EORTC-based IA diagnosis and composite biomarker positivity. Tracheobronchitis was positively predictive of a clinical and composite biomarker positive diagnosis of IA (p=0.004;95% CI–1.79–21.28 and p=0.03;95% CI–0.85–15.62 respectively). Latent class modelling resulted in the formation of 3 groups: Class 1: likely fungal infection; Class 2: unlikely fungal infection; Class 3: unclassifiable. A. fumigatus PCR was positive in ∼90% of class 1 LTRs compared to only 1% in class 2. Analysis of mortality showed a trend towards significance comparing class 1 with class 2 (p=0.06;HR–4.7;95% CI(0.91–24)) (figure 1).
Date Issued
2017-12-01
Date Acceptance
2017-11-01
Citation
THORAX, 2017, 72 (Suppl 3), pp.A13-A14
ISSN
0040-6376
Publisher
BMJ PUBLISHING GROUP
Start Page
A13
End Page
A14
Journal / Book Title
THORAX
Volume
72
Issue
Suppl 3
Copyright Statement
© 2017, Published by the BMJ Publishing Group Limited. For permission to use (where not already granted under a licence) please go to http://group.bmj.com/group/rights-licensing/permissions
Sponsor
National Institute for Health Research
National Institute for Health Research
Identifier
http://gateway.webofknowledge.com/gateway/Gateway.cgi?GWVersion=2&SrcApp=PARTNER_APP&SrcAuth=LinksAMR&KeyUT=WOS:000432666600024&DestLinkType=FullRecord&DestApp=ALL_WOS&UsrCustomerID=1ba7043ffcc86c417c072aa74d649202
Grant Number
BRU 6535
RDB21 79560
Source
Winter Meeting of the British-Thoracic-Society
Subjects
Science & Technology
Life Sciences & Biomedicine
Respiratory System
Publication Status
Published
Start Date
2017-12-06
Finish Date
2017-12-08
Coverage Spatial
London, ENGLAND
Date Publish Online
2017-11-15