Detection of neoplasia using dye spray chromoendoscopy in patients with a high risk of familial colorectal cancer
File(s)DDF15-2069-preview-4.pdf (106.51 KB)
Accepted version
Author(s)
Mcgowan, LA
Hopkins, LA
Monahan, KJ
Type
Journal Article
Abstract
Introduction Patients at high risk of familial colorectal cancer require surveillance colonoscopy to identify and remove polyps before malignant transformation can occur. Colonoscopy sensitivity rates vary and its effectiveness depends on user ability, adequate bowel preparation and procedure duration. Furthermore, the majority of polyps occur in the right colon and are characteristically flatter than those found in the left colon, rendering identification difficult. As such, recent guidelines have advocated the use of dye spray chromoendoscopy (DSC) to aid detection rates.1Our study assesses the use of chromoendoscopy at a district general hospital and whether polyp detection was higher in those undergoing surveillance colonoscopy when dye spray was used.
Method High risk patients were selected from our local endoscopy database Scorpio®. High risk was defined by a diagnosis of Lynch Syndrome or High Moderate risk as per BSG guidelines (i.e. a lifetime risk of colorectal cancer of >10%).2We retrospectively measured polyp detection rate, procedure duration, adequacy of bowel preparation, withdrawal time, histopathology, and the use of 0.02% indigocarmine dye spray versus white light colonoscopy (WLI). Statistical analysis was performed using chi-square test and 2 tailed T test for binary and continuous variables respectively.
Results 101 patients were included in this study (62 High Moderate risk and 39 Lynch Syndrome). WLI alone was performed for 77 patients, with DSC performed in 24. Significantly more polyps were detected by the use of dye spray, with an average polyp count of 0.49 for WLI versus 1.79 for DSC (P = 0.00332). There was a predominance of right sided lesions in this cohort. A longer withdrawal time may also be a factor in polyp detection rate. Table 1highlights our main findings.
Method High risk patients were selected from our local endoscopy database Scorpio®. High risk was defined by a diagnosis of Lynch Syndrome or High Moderate risk as per BSG guidelines (i.e. a lifetime risk of colorectal cancer of >10%).2We retrospectively measured polyp detection rate, procedure duration, adequacy of bowel preparation, withdrawal time, histopathology, and the use of 0.02% indigocarmine dye spray versus white light colonoscopy (WLI). Statistical analysis was performed using chi-square test and 2 tailed T test for binary and continuous variables respectively.
Results 101 patients were included in this study (62 High Moderate risk and 39 Lynch Syndrome). WLI alone was performed for 77 patients, with DSC performed in 24. Significantly more polyps were detected by the use of dye spray, with an average polyp count of 0.49 for WLI versus 1.79 for DSC (P = 0.00332). There was a predominance of right sided lesions in this cohort. A longer withdrawal time may also be a factor in polyp detection rate. Table 1highlights our main findings.
Date Issued
2015-06-30
Date Acceptance
2015-06-19
Citation
Gut, 2015, 64 (Suppl 1), pp.A369-A370
ISSN
1468-3288
Publisher
BMJ Publishing Group
Start Page
A369
End Page
A370
Journal / Book Title
Gut
Volume
64
Issue
Suppl 1
Copyright Statement
Copyright © 2015, BMJ Publishing Group Ltd and the British Society of Gastroenterology
Subjects
Gastroenterology & Hepatology
1103 Clinical Sciences
1114 Paediatrics And Reproductive Medicine
Publication Status
Published