Circulating 25-hydroxyvitamin D concentration and risk of breast, prostate, and colorectal cancers: the Melbourne Collaborative Cohort Study
File(s)Vitamin D and cancer_MCCS_accepted.pdf (560.23 KB)
Accepted version
Author(s)
Type
Journal Article
Abstract
Background: The role of vitamin D in cancer risk remains controversial, and limited data exist on associations between vitamin D and subtypes of specific cancers. We investigated associations between circulating 25-hydroxyvitamin D (25(OH)D) and risk of colorectal, breast, and prostate cancers, including subtypes.
Methods: A case–cohort study within the Melbourne Collaborative Cohort Study included 547 colorectal, 634 breast, and 824 prostate cancers, and a sex-stratified random sample of participants (n = 2,996). Concentration of 25(OH)D in baseline-dried blood spots was measured using LC-MS/MS. Cox regression yielded adjusted HRs and 95% confidence intervals (CI) for each cancer in relation to plasma-equivalent 25(OH)D concentration. Associations by stage and BRAF/KRAS status for colorectal cancer, estrogen receptor status for breast cancer, and aggressiveness for prostate cancer were examined in competing risks models.
Results: 25(OH)D concentrations were inversely associated with risk of colorectal cancer [highest vs. lowest 25(OH)D quintile: HR, 0.71; 95% confidence interval (CI), 0.51–0.98], which was limited to women (HR, 0.52; 95% CI, 0.33–0.82). Circulating 25(OH)D was also inversely associated with BRAF V600E–positive colorectal cancer (per 25 nmol/L increment: HR, 0.71; 95% CI, 0.50–1.01). There were no inverse associations with breast cancer (HR, 0.98; 95% CI, 0.70–1.36) or prostate cancer (HR, 1.11; 95% CI, 0.82–1.48).
Conclusions: Circulating 25(OH)D concentration was inversely associated with colorectal cancer risk for women, but not with risk of breast cancer or prostate cancer.
Methods: A case–cohort study within the Melbourne Collaborative Cohort Study included 547 colorectal, 634 breast, and 824 prostate cancers, and a sex-stratified random sample of participants (n = 2,996). Concentration of 25(OH)D in baseline-dried blood spots was measured using LC-MS/MS. Cox regression yielded adjusted HRs and 95% confidence intervals (CI) for each cancer in relation to plasma-equivalent 25(OH)D concentration. Associations by stage and BRAF/KRAS status for colorectal cancer, estrogen receptor status for breast cancer, and aggressiveness for prostate cancer were examined in competing risks models.
Results: 25(OH)D concentrations were inversely associated with risk of colorectal cancer [highest vs. lowest 25(OH)D quintile: HR, 0.71; 95% confidence interval (CI), 0.51–0.98], which was limited to women (HR, 0.52; 95% CI, 0.33–0.82). Circulating 25(OH)D was also inversely associated with BRAF V600E–positive colorectal cancer (per 25 nmol/L increment: HR, 0.71; 95% CI, 0.50–1.01). There were no inverse associations with breast cancer (HR, 0.98; 95% CI, 0.70–1.36) or prostate cancer (HR, 1.11; 95% CI, 0.82–1.48).
Conclusions: Circulating 25(OH)D concentration was inversely associated with colorectal cancer risk for women, but not with risk of breast cancer or prostate cancer.
Date Issued
2019-05
Date Acceptance
2019-02-26
Citation
Cancer Epidemiology Biomarkers & Prevention, 2019, 28 (5)
ISSN
1055-9965
Publisher
American Association for Cancer Research (AACR)
Journal / Book Title
Cancer Epidemiology Biomarkers & Prevention
Volume
28
Issue
5
Copyright Statement
© 2019 American Association for Cancer Research.
Identifier
https://cebp.aacrjournals.org/content/28/5/900.full-text.pdf
Subjects
Science & Technology
Life Sciences & Biomedicine
Oncology
Public, Environmental & Occupational Health
VITAMIN-D STATUS
FOLLOW-UP
ALL-CAUSE
MORTALITY
D-1-ALPHA-HYDROXYLASE
MUTATION
HEALTH
TIME
Epidemiology
11 Medical and Health Sciences
Publication Status
Published
Date Publish Online
2019-03-06