Cardiac rehabilitation in patients with coronary heart disease-provision, attendance, and outcomes: results from the INTERASPIRE survey from fourteen countries across six WHO regions
File(s) INTERASPIRE Cardiac rehabilitation_Global Heart 2025.pdf (1.62 MB)
Published version
Author(s)
Type
Journal Article
Abstract
Background: INTERASPIRE was an observational study of patients with coronary heart disease (CHD) from 88 hospitals in 14 countries across all six WHO regions. The objective was to describe the proportions of patients referred to and attending cardiac rehabilitation (CR) programmes and to compare lifestyle and risk factor target achievement according to participation in a CR programme.
Methods: Patients 18–80 years of age, with a first or recurrent coronary hospitalisation (acute coronary syndrome and/or revascularisation procedure) were identified and invited to an interview and examination, between six months and two years after the index hospitalisation.
Results: Overall, 4,548 (21.1% female) patients were interviewed a median of 1.05 (interquartile range 0.76–1.45) years after hospitalization. Of those patients, 34.4% reported having been advised to participate in a CR programme, though the percentage varied widely by country, from 4.0% in Kenya to 69.6% in Poland. Among patients advised to participate in CR, 57.1% participated in ≥50% of all sessions, 15.4% participated in <50% of the sessions, and 27.4% did not participate at all. Only 19.6% of all patients recruited to the study attended ≥50% of sessions. Content of programmes reported by patients also varied enormously between countries. Low education level, elective PCI, or unstable angina as recruiting events were associated with lower attendance rates. Attendance at ≥50% of all CR sessions was associated with a lower prevalence of persistent smoking and physical inactivity, better control of blood pressure and LDL-cholesterol, and a higher use of cardioprotective medications.
Conclusions: INTERASPIRE provides a standardised international picture of CR provision and attendance in patients with CHD. Despite CR being a Class 1 recommendation in all international guidelines, only one third of CHD patients reported being advised to attend any form of CR and just one in five patients attended 50% of the sessions, with striking heterogeneity between regions and countries. National cardiology societies should advocate to their governments for urgent investment in standardised CR services.
Methods: Patients 18–80 years of age, with a first or recurrent coronary hospitalisation (acute coronary syndrome and/or revascularisation procedure) were identified and invited to an interview and examination, between six months and two years after the index hospitalisation.
Results: Overall, 4,548 (21.1% female) patients were interviewed a median of 1.05 (interquartile range 0.76–1.45) years after hospitalization. Of those patients, 34.4% reported having been advised to participate in a CR programme, though the percentage varied widely by country, from 4.0% in Kenya to 69.6% in Poland. Among patients advised to participate in CR, 57.1% participated in ≥50% of all sessions, 15.4% participated in <50% of the sessions, and 27.4% did not participate at all. Only 19.6% of all patients recruited to the study attended ≥50% of sessions. Content of programmes reported by patients also varied enormously between countries. Low education level, elective PCI, or unstable angina as recruiting events were associated with lower attendance rates. Attendance at ≥50% of all CR sessions was associated with a lower prevalence of persistent smoking and physical inactivity, better control of blood pressure and LDL-cholesterol, and a higher use of cardioprotective medications.
Conclusions: INTERASPIRE provides a standardised international picture of CR provision and attendance in patients with CHD. Despite CR being a Class 1 recommendation in all international guidelines, only one third of CHD patients reported being advised to attend any form of CR and just one in five patients attended 50% of the sessions, with striking heterogeneity between regions and countries. National cardiology societies should advocate to their governments for urgent investment in standardised CR services.
Date Issued
2025-01-01
Date Acceptance
2025-08-04
Citation
Global Heart, 2025, 20 (1)
ISSN
2211-8160
Publisher
Ubiquity Press
Journal / Book Title
Global Heart
Volume
20
Issue
1
Copyright Statement
© 2025 The Author(s). This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (CC-BY 4.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited. See http://creativecommons.org/ licenses/by/4.0/.
License URL
Identifier
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/40917797
Subjects
Cardiac & Cardiovascular Systems
cardiac rehabilitation
CARDIOLOGY
CARDIOVASCULAR PREVENTION
Cardiovascular System & Cardiology
coronary heart disease
EUROPEAN ASSOCIATION
INTERASPIRE
Life Sciences & Biomedicine
referral
Science & Technology
secondary prevention
Publication Status
Published
Coverage Spatial
England
Article Number
75
Date Publish Online
2025-09-02
