Repository logo
  • Log In
    Log in via Symplectic to deposit your publication(s).
Repository logo
  • About
  • Communities & Collections
  • Advanced Search
  • Statistics
  • Log In
    Log in via Symplectic to deposit your publication(s).
  1. Home
  2. Faculty of Medicine
  3. Department of Surgery and Cancer
  4. Department of Surgery and Cancer PhD Theses
  5. The experience of recurrent oropharyngeal cancer and its impact on function and quality of life outcomes
 
  • Details
The experience of recurrent oropharyngeal cancer and its impact on function and quality of life outcomes
File(s)
Brady-G-2025-PhD-Thesis.pdf (6.52 MB)
Thesis
Author(s)
Brady, Grainne
Type
Thesis
Abstract
Recurrent oropharyngeal cancer (rOPC) presents some of the most challenging decision-making in head and neck cancer (HNC) practice. Persistent toxicities from previous treatments, including long-term and late swallowing dysfunction, coupled with the potential function and quality of life (QoL) morbidity of further treatment(s) can influence decision-making. National guidelines emphasise that patients must be counselled on the function and QoL morbidity of treatments. However, little is known about the functional morbidity of treatments and essential patient experience data is lacking.
Aim:
To address gaps in the current evidence base with a focus on function, QoL, patient priorities, and patient and carer experience.
Method:
A systematic review was undertaken to investigate if and how function, QoL and patient experience data are collected and reported for patients undergoing curative and non-curative treatments for rOPC. This informed the development and undertaking of a multi-centre mixed methods study to investigate function and QoL outcomes, patient priorities and the patient and carer experience of rOPC which was underpinned by patient and public involvement and engagement (PPI/E) from concept to completion.
Results:
Function and QoL will change with treatment for rOPC. Treatment-related priorities do not and remain focused on cure or survival, with patients acknowledging lower success rates and the possibility of poorer function/ QoL. Patient and carer experiences vary in terms of the opportunity for shared decision-making (SDM), pre-treatment counselling and ongoing support during and following treatment, highlighting an inequity of care.
Conclusion:
Clinical practice needs to focus on the provision of personalised care and SDM where patient concerns, values and priorities define the care, treatment and support provided. This needs to be informed by future research seeking to define core outcomes required to inform this SDM process and to capture the unique and changing needs of patients and their caregivers throughout the treatment pathway.
Version
Open Access
Date Issued
2024-10-15
Date Awarded
01/02/2025
URI
https://hdl.handle.net/10044/1/117998
DOI
https://doi.org/10.25560/117998
License URL
Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International
Advisor
Wells, Mary
Roe, Justin
Lagergren, Pernilla
Paleri, Vinidh
Sponsor
National Institute of Health and Care Research
Grant Number
NIHR-ICA-CDRF- NIHR300437
Publisher Department
Department of Surgery & Cancer
Publisher Institution
Imperial College London
Qualification Level
Doctoral
Qualification Name
Doctor of Philosophy (PhD)
About
Spiral Depositing with Spiral Publishing with Spiral Symplectic
Contact us
Open access team Report an issue
Other Services
Scholarly Communications Library Services
logo

Imperial College London

South Kensington Campus

London SW7 2AZ, UK

tel: +44 (0)20 7589 5111

Accessibility Modern slavery statement Cookie Policy

Built with DSpace-CRIS software - Extension maintained and optimized by 4Science

  • Cookie settings
  • Privacy policy
  • End User Agreement
  • Send Feedback