The societal cost of vaccine refusal: a modelling study using measles vaccination as a case study
File(s)
Published version
Author(s)
Mesa, Daniela Olivera
Winskill, Peter
Ghani, Azra C
Hauck, Katharina
Type
Journal Article
Abstract
Background
Increasing vaccine hesitancy and refusal poses a challenge to public health as even small reductions in vaccine uptake can result in large outbreaks of infectious diseases. Here we estimate the societal costs of vaccine refusal using measles as a case study.
Methods
We developed a compartmental metapopulation model of measles transmission to explore how the changes in the size and level of social mixing between populations that are “pro-vaccination”, and “anti-vaccination” impacts the burden of measles. Using the projected cases and deaths, we calculated the health, healthcare, direct medical costs, and productivity loss associated with vaccine refusal. Using measles in England as a case study, we quantified the societal costs that each vaccine refusal imposes on society.
Findings
When there is a high level of mixing between the pro- and anti-vaccination populations, those that refuse to be vaccinated benefit from the herd immunity afforded by the pro-vaccination population. At the same time, their refusal to be vaccinated increases the burden in those that are vaccinated due to imperfect vaccines, and in those that are not able to be vaccinated due to other underlying health conditions. Using England as a case study, we estimate that this translates to a societal loss of GBP 292 million and disease burden of 17 630 quality-adjusted-life-years (sensitivity range 10 594–50 379) over a 20-year time horizon. Of these costs, 26 % are attributable to healthcare costs and 74 % to productivity losses for patients and their carers. This translates to a societal loss per vaccine refusal of GBP 162.21 and 0.01 (0.006–0.03) quality-adjusted-life-years.
Interpretation
Our findings demonstrate that even low levels of vaccine refusal can have a substantial and measurable societal burden on the population. These estimates can support the value of investment in interventions that address vaccine hesitancy and vaccine refusal, providing not only improved public health but also potential economic benefits to society.
Increasing vaccine hesitancy and refusal poses a challenge to public health as even small reductions in vaccine uptake can result in large outbreaks of infectious diseases. Here we estimate the societal costs of vaccine refusal using measles as a case study.
Methods
We developed a compartmental metapopulation model of measles transmission to explore how the changes in the size and level of social mixing between populations that are “pro-vaccination”, and “anti-vaccination” impacts the burden of measles. Using the projected cases and deaths, we calculated the health, healthcare, direct medical costs, and productivity loss associated with vaccine refusal. Using measles in England as a case study, we quantified the societal costs that each vaccine refusal imposes on society.
Findings
When there is a high level of mixing between the pro- and anti-vaccination populations, those that refuse to be vaccinated benefit from the herd immunity afforded by the pro-vaccination population. At the same time, their refusal to be vaccinated increases the burden in those that are vaccinated due to imperfect vaccines, and in those that are not able to be vaccinated due to other underlying health conditions. Using England as a case study, we estimate that this translates to a societal loss of GBP 292 million and disease burden of 17 630 quality-adjusted-life-years (sensitivity range 10 594–50 379) over a 20-year time horizon. Of these costs, 26 % are attributable to healthcare costs and 74 % to productivity losses for patients and their carers. This translates to a societal loss per vaccine refusal of GBP 162.21 and 0.01 (0.006–0.03) quality-adjusted-life-years.
Interpretation
Our findings demonstrate that even low levels of vaccine refusal can have a substantial and measurable societal burden on the population. These estimates can support the value of investment in interventions that address vaccine hesitancy and vaccine refusal, providing not only improved public health but also potential economic benefits to society.
Date Issued
2023-06-23
Date Acceptance
2023-05-16
Citation
Vaccine, 2023, 41 (28), pp.4129-4137
ISSN
0264-410X
Publisher
Elsevier
Start Page
4129
End Page
4137
Journal / Book Title
Vaccine
Volume
41
Issue
28
Copyright Statement
© 2023 The Author(s). Published by Elsevier Ltd. This is an open access article under the CC BY license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
License URL
Identifier
https://www.webofscience.com/api/gateway?GWVersion=2&SrcApp=PARTNER_APP&SrcAuth=LinksAMR&KeyUT=WOS:001028282200001&DestLinkType=FullRecord&DestApp=ALL_WOS&UsrCustomerID=a2bf6146997ec60c407a63945d4e92bb
Subjects
HEALTH
HESITANCY
Immunology
Life Sciences & Biomedicine
Mathematical model
Measles
Medicine, Research & Experimental
OUTBREAKS
Research & Experimental Medicine
Science & Technology
Societal costs
Vaccine refusal
Publication Status
Published
Coverage Spatial
Netherlands
Date Publish Online
2023-05-30