Repository logo
  • Log In
    Log in via Symplectic to deposit your publication(s).
Repository logo
  • Communities & Collections
  • Research Outputs
  • Statistics
  • Log In
    Log in via Symplectic to deposit your publication(s).
  1. Home
  2. Faculty of Medicine
  3. Faculty of Medicine
  4. To unpack or not? Testing public health messaging about COVID-19
 
  • Details
To unpack or not? Testing public health messaging about COVID-19
File(s)
Accepted 25 March 2021.docx (1.19 MB)
Accepted version
Author(s)
Kostopoulou, Olga
Schwartz, Alan
Type
Journal Article
Abstract
Support theory suggests that the judged probability of events depends on the explicitness of their description. We tested whether risk communication messages that specify risks involved are associated with increased intentions to comply with public health advice during a pandemic. We conducted an anonymous online survey of the U.K. and U.S. public between April 24 and May 12, 2020. Participants (N = 2087) rated 14 COVID-related symptoms in terms of perceived severity and induced worry. They were then asked about their intention to practise social distancing in response to three public health messages: the standard U.K. government message: “Most people will experience only mild symptoms”; the standard message “unpacked” by listing six of those symptoms as examples; and “Most people will not require hospitalisation.” The unpacked message resulted in the highest intention to comply with social distancing (b = .22 [.04, .40], p = .02) and there was no interaction with country. Worry about symptoms was an independent predictor of intention to comply (b = .02 [.01, .03], p < .001). In the days before lockdown amidst a raging pandemic, the U.K. and U.S. governments sought to reassure the public. Had their messaging been more detailed, it might have been less reassuring but more effective in promoting social distancing.
Date Issued
2021-12-01
Date Acceptance
2021-03-25
Citation
Journal of Experimental Psychology: Applied, 2021, 27 (4), pp.751-761
URI
http://hdl.handle.net/10044/1/89689
DOI
https://www.dx.doi.org/10.1037/xap0000359
ISSN
1076-898X
Publisher
American Psychological Association
Start Page
751
End Page
761
Journal / Book Title
Journal of Experimental Psychology: Applied
Volume
27
Issue
4
Copyright Statement
© 2021 American Psychological Association.
Sponsor
National Institute for Health Research
Grant Number
n/a
Subjects
Social Sciences
Psychology, Applied
Psychology
support theory
risk perception
risk communication
social distancing
unpacking
BEHAVIOR
COVID-19
Communicable Disease Control
Humans
Pandemics
Public Health
SARS-CoV-2
Humans
Public Health
Communicable Disease Control
Pandemics
COVID-19
SARS-CoV-2
Experimental Psychology
1701 Psychology
1702 Cognitive Sciences
Publication Status
Published
Date Publish Online
2021-05-13
About
Spiral Depositing with Spiral Publishing with Spiral Symplectic
Contact us
Open access team Report an issue
Other Services
Scholarly Communications Library Services
logo

Imperial College London

South Kensington Campus

London SW7 2AZ, UK

tel: +44 (0)20 7589 5111

Accessibility Modern slavery statement Cookie Policy

Built with DSpace-CRIS software - Extension maintained and optimized by 4Science

  • Cookie settings
  • Privacy policy
  • End User Agreement
  • Send Feedback