Working-fluid selection and performance investigation of a two-phase single-reciprocating-piston heat-conversion engine
File(s)1-s2.0-S0306261916305906-main.pdf (2.43 MB)
Published version
Author(s)
Oyewunmi, OA
Kirmse, CJW
Haslam, AJ
Muller, EA
Markides, CN
Type
Journal Article
Abstract
We employ a validated first-order lumped dynamic model of the Up-THERM converter, a two-phase unsteady
heat-engine that belongs to a class of innovative devices known as thermofluidic oscillators, which contain
fewer moving parts than conventional engines and represent an attractive alternative for remote or off-grid
power generation as well as waste-heat recovery. We investigate the performance the Up-THERM with
respect to working-fluid selection for its prospective applications. An examination of relevant working-fluid
thermodynamic properties reveals that the saturation pressure and vapour-phase density of the fluid play important
roles in determining the performance of the Up-THERM – the device delivers a higher power output
at high saturation pressures and has higher exergy efficiencies at low vapour-phase densities. Furthermore,
working fluids with low critical temperatures, high critical pressures and exhibiting high values of reduced
pressures and temperatures result in designs with high power outputs. For a nominal Up-THERM design
corresponding to a target application with a heat-source temperature of 360 ◦C, water is compared with
forty-five other pure working fluids. When maximizing the power output, R113 is identified as the optimal
fluid, followed by i-hexane. Fluids such as siloxanes and heavier hydrocarbons are found to maximize the
exergy and thermal efficiencies. The ability of the Up-THERM to convert heat over a range of heat-source
temperatures is also investigated, and it is found that the device can deliver in excess of 10 kW when utilizing
thermal energy at temperatures above 200 ◦C. Of all the working fluids considered here, ammonia, R245ca,
R32, propene and butane feature prominently as optimal and versatile fluids delivering high power over a
wide range of heat-source temperatures.
heat-engine that belongs to a class of innovative devices known as thermofluidic oscillators, which contain
fewer moving parts than conventional engines and represent an attractive alternative for remote or off-grid
power generation as well as waste-heat recovery. We investigate the performance the Up-THERM with
respect to working-fluid selection for its prospective applications. An examination of relevant working-fluid
thermodynamic properties reveals that the saturation pressure and vapour-phase density of the fluid play important
roles in determining the performance of the Up-THERM – the device delivers a higher power output
at high saturation pressures and has higher exergy efficiencies at low vapour-phase densities. Furthermore,
working fluids with low critical temperatures, high critical pressures and exhibiting high values of reduced
pressures and temperatures result in designs with high power outputs. For a nominal Up-THERM design
corresponding to a target application with a heat-source temperature of 360 ◦C, water is compared with
forty-five other pure working fluids. When maximizing the power output, R113 is identified as the optimal
fluid, followed by i-hexane. Fluids such as siloxanes and heavier hydrocarbons are found to maximize the
exergy and thermal efficiencies. The ability of the Up-THERM to convert heat over a range of heat-source
temperatures is also investigated, and it is found that the device can deliver in excess of 10 kW when utilizing
thermal energy at temperatures above 200 ◦C. Of all the working fluids considered here, ammonia, R245ca,
R32, propene and butane feature prominently as optimal and versatile fluids delivering high power over a
wide range of heat-source temperatures.
Date Issued
2016-06-20
Date Acceptance
2016-05-01
Citation
Applied Energy, 2016, 186 (Part 3), pp.376-395
ISSN
0306-2619
Publisher
Elsevier
Start Page
376
End Page
395
Journal / Book Title
Applied Energy
Volume
186
Issue
Part 3
Copyright Statement
© 2016 The Authors. Published by Elsevier Ltd. This is an open access article under the CC BY license (http://
creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
Sponsor
Engineering & Physical Science Research Council (EPSRC)
Grant Number
EP/J006041/1
Subjects
Energy
09 Engineering
14 Economics
Publication Status
Published