Scaling and kinematics optimisation of the scapula and thorax in upper limb musculoskeletal models
Author(s)
Prinold, JAI
Bull, AMJ
Type
Journal Article
Abstract
Accurate representation of individual scapula kinematics and subject geometries is vital in musculoskeletal models applied to upper limb pathology and performance. In applying individual kinematics to a model׳s cadaveric geometry, model constraints are commonly prescriptive. These rely on thorax scaling to effectively define the scapula׳s path but do not consider the area underneath the scapula in scaling, and assume a fixed conoid ligament length. These constraints may not allow continuous solutions or close agreement with directly measured kinematics.
A novel method is presented to scale the thorax based on palpated scapula landmarks. The scapula and clavicle kinematics are optimised with the constraint that the scapula medial border does not penetrate the thorax. Conoid ligament length is not used as a constraint. This method is simulated in the UK National Shoulder Model and compared to four other methods, including the standard technique, during three pull-up techniques (n=11). These are high-performance activities covering a large range of motion.
Model solutions without substantial jumps in the joint kinematics data were improved from 23% of trials with the standard method, to 100% of trials with the new method. Agreement with measured kinematics was significantly improved (more than 10° closer at p<0.001) when compared to standard methods. The removal of the conoid ligament constraint and the novel thorax scaling correction factor were shown to be key. Separation of the medial border of the scapula from the thorax was large, although this may be physiologically correct due to the high loads and high arm elevation angles.
A novel method is presented to scale the thorax based on palpated scapula landmarks. The scapula and clavicle kinematics are optimised with the constraint that the scapula medial border does not penetrate the thorax. Conoid ligament length is not used as a constraint. This method is simulated in the UK National Shoulder Model and compared to four other methods, including the standard technique, during three pull-up techniques (n=11). These are high-performance activities covering a large range of motion.
Model solutions without substantial jumps in the joint kinematics data were improved from 23% of trials with the standard method, to 100% of trials with the new method. Agreement with measured kinematics was significantly improved (more than 10° closer at p<0.001) when compared to standard methods. The removal of the conoid ligament constraint and the novel thorax scaling correction factor were shown to be key. Separation of the medial border of the scapula from the thorax was large, although this may be physiologically correct due to the high loads and high arm elevation angles.
Date Issued
2014-08-22
Date Acceptance
2014-05-27
Citation
Journal of Biomechanics, 2014, 47 (11), pp.2813-2819
ISSN
0021-9290
Publisher
Elsevier
Start Page
2813
End Page
2819
Journal / Book Title
Journal of Biomechanics
Volume
47
Issue
11
Copyright Statement
© 2014 The Authors. Published by Elsevier Ltd. This is an open access article under the CC BY license
(http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/).
(http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/).
License URL
Subjects
Science & Technology
Life Sciences & Biomedicine
Technology
Biophysics
Engineering, Biomedical
Engineering
Biomechanics
Subject specific
Modelling
Shoulder
Conoid ligament
Pull-up
GLENOHUMERAL JOINT
CORACOCLAVICULAR LIGAMENTS
SHOULDER ABDUCTION
VALIDATION
POSITIONS
TRACKING
ANATOMY
FORCES
MUSCLE
ELBOW
Publication Status
Published