Child health research and planning in Europe disadvantaged by major gaps and disparities in published statistics
File(s)EJPH Data Paper New Figure 2.2.tif (41.92 KB) EJPH Data Paper Resub draft 2 Clean.pdf (233.4 KB)
Accepted version
Accepted version
Author(s)
Rigby, Michael
Deshpande, Shalmali
Blair, Mitchel
Type
Journal Article
Abstract
Background
Population data, such as mortality and morbidity statistics, are essential for many reasons, including giving context for research, supporting action on health determinants, formulation of evidence-based policy for health care and outcome evaluation. However, when considering children, it is difficult to find such data, despite children comprising one-fifth of the European population and being in a key formative life stage and dependent on societal support. Moreover, it would be expected that there should be confidence in the key child health data available, with little to no discrepancy between recognized health statistic databases.
Methods
This study explored the main health databases in or including Europe to collate child mortality data, for both all-cause and specific-cause mortality. Tables were constructed for comparison of values and rankings.
Results
The results show that there are major differences in reported mortality data between two prominent health statistic databases, difference in coding systems, and unannounced changes within one of the databases.
Conclusions
The lack of health data for children seems compounded by challenges to the trust and credibility, which are vital if these data are to have utility. Children and society are the losers, and resolution is needed as a priority.
Population data, such as mortality and morbidity statistics, are essential for many reasons, including giving context for research, supporting action on health determinants, formulation of evidence-based policy for health care and outcome evaluation. However, when considering children, it is difficult to find such data, despite children comprising one-fifth of the European population and being in a key formative life stage and dependent on societal support. Moreover, it would be expected that there should be confidence in the key child health data available, with little to no discrepancy between recognized health statistic databases.
Methods
This study explored the main health databases in or including Europe to collate child mortality data, for both all-cause and specific-cause mortality. Tables were constructed for comparison of values and rankings.
Results
The results show that there are major differences in reported mortality data between two prominent health statistic databases, difference in coding systems, and unannounced changes within one of the databases.
Conclusions
The lack of health data for children seems compounded by challenges to the trust and credibility, which are vital if these data are to have utility. Children and society are the losers, and resolution is needed as a priority.
Date Issued
2020-08-01
Date Acceptance
2020-02-17
Citation
European Journal of Public Health, 2020, 30 (4), pp.693-697
ISSN
1101-1262
Publisher
Oxford University Press (OUP)
Start Page
693
End Page
697
Journal / Book Title
European Journal of Public Health
Volume
30
Issue
4
Copyright Statement
The Author(s) 2020. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the European Public Health Association. All rights reserved. This is a pre-copy-editing, author-produced version of an article accepted for publication in European Journal of Public Health following peer review. The definitive publisher-authenticated version is available online at: https://academic.oup.com/eurpub/article/doi/10.1093/eurpub/ckaa052/5811102
Sponsor
European Commission Directorate-General for Research and Innovation
Grant Number
634201
Subjects
Public Health
1117 Public Health and Health Services
Publication Status
Published
Date Publish Online
2020-03-24