Repository logo
  • Log In
    Log in via Symplectic to deposit your publication(s).
Repository logo
  • Communities & Collections
  • Research Outputs
  • Statistics
  • Log In
    Log in via Symplectic to deposit your publication(s).
  1. Home
  2. Faculty of Medicine
  3. Faculty of Medicine
  4. Acceptability of intranasal live attenuated influenza vaccine, influenza knowledge and vaccine intent in The Gambia
 
  • Details
Acceptability of intranasal live attenuated influenza vaccine, influenza knowledge and vaccine intent in The Gambia
File(s)
1-s2.0-S0264410X18302111-main.pdf (683.02 KB)
Published version
Author(s)
Armitage, Edwin
Camara, Janko
Bah, Sulayman
Forster, Alice
Clarke, Ed
more
Type
Journal Article
Abstract
Background

The burden of influenza is increasingly recognised in Africa. The WHO recommends introducing influenza vaccination to high-risk groups: pregnant women, children <5 years, and the elderly. The Gambia currently has no influenza vaccination policy, but the NASIMMUNE study, a clinical trial of intranasal live attenuated influenza vaccines (LAIV) in young children provided an opportunity to study maternal attitudes towards LAIV for the first time in sub-Saharan Africa. We assess acceptability of LAIV, influenza knowledge and attitudes towards influenza vaccination in Gambian women. Additionally, we investigate predictors of willingness to receive influenza vaccine (intent) in pregnancy or seasonally for children <5.
Methods

A cross-sectional survey was conducted in Gambian women at two urban health facilities. To assess LAIV acceptability, the exposure group (women whose children had received LAIV during the NASIMMUNE study) were compared to a control group (women whose children were not enrolled in the NASIMMUNE study). Demographics and health belief constructs were analysed as predictors of influenza knowledge and vaccine intent.
Findings

The exposure group (n = 150) expressed a higher preference for a nasal spray vaccine than an injection compared to the control group (n = 304) (93.3% vs. 34.9%, OR = 26.15, p < 0.0001). Those in the exposure group who preferred the nasal spray found it less distressing, safer or equally safe, and easier or equally easy to give (all p < 0.001) than injections. Influenza knowledge increased with education level (p = 0.006 for higher education vs. none), and varied between sites (p = 0.0005). Vaccine intent was >98%, but no association with influenza knowledge or difference between groups was observed. Various health belief constructs were associated with vaccine intent.
Conclusion

LAIV acceptability was higher in those with first-hand experience. Influenza vaccine intent was also high. Incorporation of seasonal LAIV into the childhood immunisation schedule in The Gambia would be feasible, particularly if combined with community-based health education.
Date Issued
2018-03-20
Date Acceptance
2018-02-05
Citation
Vaccine, 2018, 36 (13), pp.1772-1780
URI
http://hdl.handle.net/10044/1/57009
DOI
https://www.dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.vaccine.2018.02.037
ISSN
0264-410X
Publisher
Elsevier
Start Page
1772
End Page
1780
Journal / Book Title
Vaccine
Volume
36
Issue
13
Copyright Statement
© 2018 The Authors. Published by Elsevier Ltd.
This is an open access article under the CC BY license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/)
Sponsor
Wellcome Trust
Grant Number
110058/Z/15/Z
Subjects
Science & Technology
Life Sciences & Biomedicine
Immunology
Medicine, Research & Experimental
Research & Experimental Medicine
Influenza
Vaccine acceptability
Intranasal live attenuated influenza vaccine
Knowledge, attitudes and perceptions
Health Belief Model
The Gambia
HEALTH BELIEF MODEL
PARTICIPATORY WOMENS GROUPS
RANDOMIZED CONTROLLED-TRIAL
RURAL EASTERN INDIA
SEASONAL INFLUENZA
PREGNANT-WOMEN
SOUTH-AFRICA
ATTITUDES
IMMUNIZATION
PERCEPTIONS
06 Biological Sciences
07 Agricultural And Veterinary Sciences
11 Medical And Health Sciences
Virology
Publication Status
Published
Date Publish Online
2018-02-23
About
Spiral Depositing with Spiral Publishing with Spiral Symplectic
Contact us
Open access team Report an issue
Other Services
Scholarly Communications Library Services
logo

Imperial College London

South Kensington Campus

London SW7 2AZ, UK

tel: +44 (0)20 7589 5111

Accessibility Modern slavery statement Cookie Policy

Built with DSpace-CRIS software - Extension maintained and optimized by 4Science

  • Cookie settings
  • Privacy policy
  • End User Agreement
  • Send Feedback