The impact of starchy food structure on postprandial glycemic response and appetite: a systematic review with meta-analysis of randomized crossover trials
File(s)nqab098.pdf (6.98 MB)
Published version
Author(s)
Cai, Mingzhu
Dou, Bowen
Pugh, Jennifer
Lett, Aaron
Frost, Gary
Type
Journal Article
Abstract
Background
Starchy foods can have a profound effect on metabolism. The structural properties of starchy foods can affect their digestibility and postprandial metabolic responses, which in the long term may be associated with the risk of type 2 diabetes and obesity.
Objectives
This systematic review sought to evaluate the clinical evidence regarding the impact of the microstructures within starchy foods on postprandial glucose and insulin responses alongside appetite regulation.
Methods
A systematic search was performed in the PUBMED, Ovid Medicine, EMBASE, and Google Scholar databases for data published up to 18 January 2021. Data were extracted by 3 independent reviewers from randomized crossover trials (RCTs) that investigated the effect of microstructural factors on postprandial glucose, insulin, appetite-regulating hormone responses, and subjective satiety scores in healthy participants.
Results
We identified 745 potential articles, and 25 RCTs (n = 369 participants) met our inclusion criteria: 6 evaluated the amylose-to-amylopectin ratio, 6 evaluated the degree of starch gelatinization, 2 evaluated the degree of starch retrogradation, 1 studied starch–protein interactions, and 12 investigated cell and tissue structures. Meta-analyses showed that significant reductions in postprandial glucose and insulin levels was caused by starch with a high amylose content [standardized mean difference (SMD) = −0.64 mmol/L*min (95% CI: −0.83 to −0.46) and SMD = −0.81 pmol/L*min (95% CI: −1.07 to −0.55), respectively], less-gelatinized starch [SMD = −0.54 mmol/L*min (95% CI: −0.75 to −0.34) and SMD = −0.48 pmol/L*min (95% CI: −0.75 to −0.21), respectively], retrograded starch (for glucose incremental AUC; SMD = −0.46 pmol/L*min; 95% CI: −0.80 to −0.12), and intact and large particles [SMD = −0.43 mmol/L*min (95% CI: −0.58 to −0.28) and SMD = −0.63 pmol/L*min (95% CI: −0.86 to −0.40), respectively]. All analyses showed minor or moderate heterogeneity (I2 < 50%). Sufficient evidence was not found to suggest how these structural factors influence appetite.
Conclusions
The manipulation of microstructures in starchy food may be an effective way to improve postprandial glycemia and insulinemia in the healthy population. The protocol for this systematic review and meta-analysis was registered in the international prospective register of systematic reviews (PROSPERO) as CRD42020190873.
Starchy foods can have a profound effect on metabolism. The structural properties of starchy foods can affect their digestibility and postprandial metabolic responses, which in the long term may be associated with the risk of type 2 diabetes and obesity.
Objectives
This systematic review sought to evaluate the clinical evidence regarding the impact of the microstructures within starchy foods on postprandial glucose and insulin responses alongside appetite regulation.
Methods
A systematic search was performed in the PUBMED, Ovid Medicine, EMBASE, and Google Scholar databases for data published up to 18 January 2021. Data were extracted by 3 independent reviewers from randomized crossover trials (RCTs) that investigated the effect of microstructural factors on postprandial glucose, insulin, appetite-regulating hormone responses, and subjective satiety scores in healthy participants.
Results
We identified 745 potential articles, and 25 RCTs (n = 369 participants) met our inclusion criteria: 6 evaluated the amylose-to-amylopectin ratio, 6 evaluated the degree of starch gelatinization, 2 evaluated the degree of starch retrogradation, 1 studied starch–protein interactions, and 12 investigated cell and tissue structures. Meta-analyses showed that significant reductions in postprandial glucose and insulin levels was caused by starch with a high amylose content [standardized mean difference (SMD) = −0.64 mmol/L*min (95% CI: −0.83 to −0.46) and SMD = −0.81 pmol/L*min (95% CI: −1.07 to −0.55), respectively], less-gelatinized starch [SMD = −0.54 mmol/L*min (95% CI: −0.75 to −0.34) and SMD = −0.48 pmol/L*min (95% CI: −0.75 to −0.21), respectively], retrograded starch (for glucose incremental AUC; SMD = −0.46 pmol/L*min; 95% CI: −0.80 to −0.12), and intact and large particles [SMD = −0.43 mmol/L*min (95% CI: −0.58 to −0.28) and SMD = −0.63 pmol/L*min (95% CI: −0.86 to −0.40), respectively]. All analyses showed minor or moderate heterogeneity (I2 < 50%). Sufficient evidence was not found to suggest how these structural factors influence appetite.
Conclusions
The manipulation of microstructures in starchy food may be an effective way to improve postprandial glycemia and insulinemia in the healthy population. The protocol for this systematic review and meta-analysis was registered in the international prospective register of systematic reviews (PROSPERO) as CRD42020190873.
Date Issued
2021-08-01
Date Acceptance
2021-03-04
Citation
American Journal of Clinical Nutrition, 2021, 114 (2), pp.472-487
ISSN
0002-9165
Publisher
American Society for Nutrition
Start Page
472
End Page
487
Journal / Book Title
American Journal of Clinical Nutrition
Volume
114
Issue
2
Copyright Statement
©The Author(s)2021. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the American Society for Nutrition. This is an Open Access article distributed under the termsof the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted reuse, distribution, and reproduction in anymedium, provided the original work is properly cited.
License URL
Sponsor
Biotechnology and Biological Sciences Research Cou
Grant Number
N/A
Subjects
Science & Technology
Life Sciences & Biomedicine
Nutrition & Dietetics
starchy foods
food structure
postprandial
glucose
insulin
appetite
randomized crossover trials
RESISTANT STARCH
PARTICLE-SIZE
GELATINIZATION BEHAVIOR
INSULIN RESPONSES
AMYLOPECTIN RATIO
GLUCOSE RESPONSE
CEREAL PRODUCTS
GUT HORMONES
WHITE RICE
SATIETY
appetite
food structure
glucose
insulin
postprandial
randomized crossover trials
starchy foods
Blood Glucose
Dietary Carbohydrates
Food Analysis
Humans
Postprandial Period
Starch
Humans
Starch
Dietary Carbohydrates
Blood Glucose
Food Analysis
Postprandial Period
Nutrition & Dietetics
09 Engineering
11 Medical and Health Sciences
Publication Status
Published
Date Publish Online
2021-05-28