The Assessment of Registrars’ Non-technical Skills in the Emergency Department
Author(s)
Flowerdew, Lynsey Anne
Type
Thesis
Abstract
In recent years safety in medicine has been high on the agenda, both for government and for
healthcare providers. This thesis starts by describing the evolution of patient safety and then
goes on to explore error specifically in the Emergency Department (ED). Focus is drawn to
the role of non-technical skills for improving safety.
The initial broad aim of this research was to learn how the ED team could function better to
improve patient care. An interview study is developed to investigate how ED staff change
their behaviour during periods of high demand and to determine the direction of future
research. This study highlights that staff would benefit from increased awareness of the nontechnical
skills that contribute to effective teamwork and enhanced patient safety. The
interviews also reveal the leadership role of the registrar is of particular importance.
Therefore, a series of studies are developed to identify and describe the non-technical skills
required by Emergency Medicine trainees, with a specific focus on leadership.
The process of developing a provisional assessment tool for assessing non-technical skills in
the ED is described. This draws on published literature and curricula as well as considering
existing methods of assessment. The assessment tool is revised using re-analysis of staff
interviews and a series of preliminary observations in the ED. Content validity of the tool is
measured using a survey of expert opinion and this helps to further refine the tool
components. An experimental study reveals that whilst adequate levels of inter-rater
reliability are achievable, rater accuracy appears to be more problematic. Various sources or
rater error are also explored and this leads onto a larger, multicentre observational study
investigating use of the tool in the workplace. Further data for reliability is collected and
field notes are analysed to provide a detailed description of the non-technical skills displayed
by ED registrars.
Findings of the studies are summarised and limitations, applications and further research are
discussed.
healthcare providers. This thesis starts by describing the evolution of patient safety and then
goes on to explore error specifically in the Emergency Department (ED). Focus is drawn to
the role of non-technical skills for improving safety.
The initial broad aim of this research was to learn how the ED team could function better to
improve patient care. An interview study is developed to investigate how ED staff change
their behaviour during periods of high demand and to determine the direction of future
research. This study highlights that staff would benefit from increased awareness of the nontechnical
skills that contribute to effective teamwork and enhanced patient safety. The
interviews also reveal the leadership role of the registrar is of particular importance.
Therefore, a series of studies are developed to identify and describe the non-technical skills
required by Emergency Medicine trainees, with a specific focus on leadership.
The process of developing a provisional assessment tool for assessing non-technical skills in
the ED is described. This draws on published literature and curricula as well as considering
existing methods of assessment. The assessment tool is revised using re-analysis of staff
interviews and a series of preliminary observations in the ED. Content validity of the tool is
measured using a survey of expert opinion and this helps to further refine the tool
components. An experimental study reveals that whilst adequate levels of inter-rater
reliability are achievable, rater accuracy appears to be more problematic. Various sources or
rater error are also explored and this leads onto a larger, multicentre observational study
investigating use of the tool in the workplace. Further data for reliability is collected and
field notes are analysed to provide a detailed description of the non-technical skills displayed
by ED registrars.
Findings of the studies are summarised and limitations, applications and further research are
discussed.
Date Issued
2011-07
Date Awarded
2012-04
Copyright Statement
Attribution NoDerivatives 4.0 International Licence (CC BY-ND)
Advisor
Vincent, Charles
Woloshynowych, Maria
Brown, Ruth
Publisher Department
Medicine: Department of Surgery and Cancer
Publisher Institution
Imperial College London
Qualification Level
Doctoral
Qualification Name
Doctor of Medicine (Research) MD (Res)