Is there a sufficient supply of Clinical Academics for UK Medical Schools? A retrospective cohort study
File(s)e086211.full.pdf (735.02 KB)
Published version
Author(s)
Waldock, William J
Hughes, Elizabeth
Dacre, Jane E
Sam, Seyed Amir
Type
Journal Article
Abstract
Objectives Clinical academics lead research to deliver medical advancements while also teaching in medical schools to maintain high-quality medical services. The objective of this project was to determine if there is a sufficient supply of clinical academics for UK medical schools.
Design Retrospective cohort study.
Setting Data were extracted from the UK Medical Education Database and the General Medical Council (GMC) annual National Trainee Survey between 2012 and 2022.
Participants 1769 registered UK doctors with academic training and a certificate of completion of training.
Main outcome measure The percentage of doctors with clinical and academic training who ended up as incumbent clinical academics at UK medical schools.
Results Approximately 50% of doctors with clinical and academic training were matched as incumbent clinical academics at UK medical schools. There was a low annual rate of incumbent clinical academics leaving their post.
Conclusion Either clinical academic trainees do not find jobs at medical schools, or they do not want the jobs that are available. These results are indicative but not conclusive as generalisation is compromised by inconsistent disclosure of data by medical schools. We discuss variables which may contribute to the loss of clinical academics and explore the health economic case for clinical academic incentive packages to improve return on training investment.
Design Retrospective cohort study.
Setting Data were extracted from the UK Medical Education Database and the General Medical Council (GMC) annual National Trainee Survey between 2012 and 2022.
Participants 1769 registered UK doctors with academic training and a certificate of completion of training.
Main outcome measure The percentage of doctors with clinical and academic training who ended up as incumbent clinical academics at UK medical schools.
Results Approximately 50% of doctors with clinical and academic training were matched as incumbent clinical academics at UK medical schools. There was a low annual rate of incumbent clinical academics leaving their post.
Conclusion Either clinical academic trainees do not find jobs at medical schools, or they do not want the jobs that are available. These results are indicative but not conclusive as generalisation is compromised by inconsistent disclosure of data by medical schools. We discuss variables which may contribute to the loss of clinical academics and explore the health economic case for clinical academic incentive packages to improve return on training investment.
Date Issued
2024-09
Date Acceptance
2024-08-01
Citation
BMJ Open, 2024, 14 (9)
ISSN
2044-6055
Publisher
BMJ Publishing Group
Journal / Book Title
BMJ Open
Volume
14
Issue
9
Copyright Statement
© Author(s) (or their
employer(s)) 2024. Re-use
permitted under CC BY-NC. No
commercial re-use. See rights
and permissions. Published by
BMJ. This is an open access article distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution Non Commercial (CC BY-NC 4.0) license, which permits others to distribute, remix, adapt, build upon this work non-commercially, and license their derivative works on different terms, provided the original work is properly cited, appropriate credit is given, any changes made indicated, and the use is non-commercial. See: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/.
employer(s)) 2024. Re-use
permitted under CC BY-NC. No
commercial re-use. See rights
and permissions. Published by
BMJ. This is an open access article distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution Non Commercial (CC BY-NC 4.0) license, which permits others to distribute, remix, adapt, build upon this work non-commercially, and license their derivative works on different terms, provided the original work is properly cited, appropriate credit is given, any changes made indicated, and the use is non-commercial. See: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/.
License URL
Identifier
https://bmjopen.bmj.com/content/14/9/e086211
Publication Status
Published
Article Number
e086211
Date Publish Online
2024-09-20