Effect of delays in the UK two-week wait cancer referral pathway during the COVID-19 pandemic on cancer survival: a modelling study
File(s)THELANCETONCOLOGY-D-20-01167_R4.pdf (1.83 MB)
Accepted version
Author(s)
Type
Journal Article
Abstract
Background: During the COVID-19 lockdown, referrals via the 2 Week Wait (2WW) urgent pathway for suspected cancer in England are reported to have dropped by up to 84%. We aimed to examine the impact on cancer survival of different scenarios of lockdown accumulated-backlog. We also aimed to examine by tumour-referral-group and age, survival benefit per referred patient considering survival decrement from delayed referral versus risk of death from nosocomial SARS-CoV-2 infection.
Methods: To construct the underlying models, we used age- and stage-stratified 10 year cancer survival estimates for England 2007-2017 for 20 common tumour-types. We applied per-day hazard ratios for cancer progression generated from observational studies of delay to-treatment. We quantified the annual numbers of cancers diagnosed via the 2WW-pathway using the 2WW age- and stage-specific breakdowns. From these, for per-patient delays of 1- 6 months, we estimated aggregate number of lives lost and life-years lost in England. Using referral-to-diagnosis conversion rates and COVID-19 case fatality rates, we also estimated the survival increment per patient referred. Findings: Per month across England in 2013-2016, on average 6,281 patients with Stage 1- 3 cancer were diagnosed via the 2WW pathway of whom 1,691 would be predicted to die within 10 years from their disease. We estimated 2WW-pathway presentational-delay from three months of lockdown will result in total in 181/361/542 attributable additional deaths (if % reduction in referrals was 25/50/75% respectively). Limited diagnostic capacity to address the backlog may result in additional delays: 401/811/1,231 attributable additional deaths are estimated if additional diagnostic capacity is delayed until months 3-8 post-lockdown. 2-month delay in 2WW investigatory referral results in average loss of life-years per-referred-patient of between 0 and 0.7, depending on age and tumour-type. Interpretation: Prompt provision of additional capacity for ‘catch-up’ in diagnostics will minimise deaths consequent from ‘diagnostic-delay’ accumulated on top of the ‘presentational-delay’. Prioritisation of patient groups for whom delay would result in most life years lost warrants consideration as an option for mitigating the aggregate burden of mortality. Funding: None
Methods: To construct the underlying models, we used age- and stage-stratified 10 year cancer survival estimates for England 2007-2017 for 20 common tumour-types. We applied per-day hazard ratios for cancer progression generated from observational studies of delay to-treatment. We quantified the annual numbers of cancers diagnosed via the 2WW-pathway using the 2WW age- and stage-specific breakdowns. From these, for per-patient delays of 1- 6 months, we estimated aggregate number of lives lost and life-years lost in England. Using referral-to-diagnosis conversion rates and COVID-19 case fatality rates, we also estimated the survival increment per patient referred. Findings: Per month across England in 2013-2016, on average 6,281 patients with Stage 1- 3 cancer were diagnosed via the 2WW pathway of whom 1,691 would be predicted to die within 10 years from their disease. We estimated 2WW-pathway presentational-delay from three months of lockdown will result in total in 181/361/542 attributable additional deaths (if % reduction in referrals was 25/50/75% respectively). Limited diagnostic capacity to address the backlog may result in additional delays: 401/811/1,231 attributable additional deaths are estimated if additional diagnostic capacity is delayed until months 3-8 post-lockdown. 2-month delay in 2WW investigatory referral results in average loss of life-years per-referred-patient of between 0 and 0.7, depending on age and tumour-type. Interpretation: Prompt provision of additional capacity for ‘catch-up’ in diagnostics will minimise deaths consequent from ‘diagnostic-delay’ accumulated on top of the ‘presentational-delay’. Prioritisation of patient groups for whom delay would result in most life years lost warrants consideration as an option for mitigating the aggregate burden of mortality. Funding: None
Date Issued
2020-08
Date Acceptance
2020-06-25
Citation
The Lancet Oncology, 2020, 21 (8), pp.1035-1044
ISSN
1213-9432
Publisher
Elsevier
Start Page
1035
End Page
1044
Journal / Book Title
The Lancet Oncology
Volume
21
Issue
8
Copyright Statement
© 2020 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved. This manuscript is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International Licence http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/
Sponsor
Imperial College Healthcare NHS Trust- BRC Funding
Identifier
https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1470204520303922?via%3Dihub
Grant Number
RDB01 79560
Subjects
Science & Technology
Life Sciences & Biomedicine
Oncology
BREAST-CANCER
MUSCLE INVASION
DIAGNOSIS
CYSTECTOMY
TIME
Adult
Aged
Aged, 80 and over
Betacoronavirus
Coronavirus Infections
England
Female
Humans
Male
Middle Aged
Models, Statistical
Neoplasms
Pandemics
Pneumonia, Viral
Referral and Consultation
Survival Analysis
Waiting Lists
Humans
Pneumonia, Viral
Coronavirus Infections
Neoplasms
Models, Statistical
Survival Analysis
Adult
Aged
Aged, 80 and over
Middle Aged
Waiting Lists
Referral and Consultation
England
Female
Male
Pandemics
Betacoronavirus
Oncology & Carcinogenesis
1112 Oncology and Carcinogenesis
Publication Status
Published
Date Publish Online
2020-07-20