Urban futures: Systemic or system changing interventions? A literature review using Meadows' leverage points as analytical framework
File(s)Accepted_Urban Futures Systemic or System Changing.pdf (1.14 MB)
Accepted version
Author(s)
Angheloiu, Corina
Tennant, Mike
Type
Journal Article
Abstract
Urban-led change for sustainability is a key site of intervention in delivering the ambitions of the Sustainable Development Goals. Within this broad discourse, four umbrella concepts have emerged in recent decades: urban sustainability, urban transitions, urban transformation and urban resilience.
This literature review aims to offer a qualitative assessment of the types of interventions currently being advocated for in academic-led literature. Firstly, the paper presents an overview of the concepts and summarises current gaps; secondly, it uses Donella Meadows' Leverage Points as analytical framework to categorise and discuss interventions supported in the literature.
Our findings indicate that although the literature advocates for systemic change towards sustainability as an outcome of a large palette of urban interventions, less consideration is given to the means of achieving these. The findings highlight the need to focus on processes as much as on outcomes when advocating, devising or implementing interventions. This requires a process of understanding and negotiating trade-offs and the different worldviews and values that underpin them. Addressing this entails going beyond technocratic skills through cultivating reflexivity, effective communities of practice and new forms of organising for knowledge production, as well as interrogate our roles and agency as urban researchers.
This literature review aims to offer a qualitative assessment of the types of interventions currently being advocated for in academic-led literature. Firstly, the paper presents an overview of the concepts and summarises current gaps; secondly, it uses Donella Meadows' Leverage Points as analytical framework to categorise and discuss interventions supported in the literature.
Our findings indicate that although the literature advocates for systemic change towards sustainability as an outcome of a large palette of urban interventions, less consideration is given to the means of achieving these. The findings highlight the need to focus on processes as much as on outcomes when advocating, devising or implementing interventions. This requires a process of understanding and negotiating trade-offs and the different worldviews and values that underpin them. Addressing this entails going beyond technocratic skills through cultivating reflexivity, effective communities of practice and new forms of organising for knowledge production, as well as interrogate our roles and agency as urban researchers.
Date Issued
2020-09-01
Date Acceptance
2020-05-20
Citation
Cities, 2020, 104
ISSN
0264-2751
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Journal / Book Title
Cities
Volume
104
Copyright Statement
© 2020 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved. This manuscript is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International Licence http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/
Sponsor
Economic and Social Research Council
Grant Number
ES/P000703/1
Subjects
Social Sciences
Urban Studies
Urban resilience
Urban sustainability
Urban transitions
Urban transformation
Leverage points, urban interventions
GLOBAL ENVIRONMENTAL-CHANGE
SUSTAINABILITY TRANSITIONS
RESILIENT CITY
TRANSFORMATION
CITIES
POLICY
POLITICS
THINKING
CHALLENGE
AGENDA
Urban & Regional Planning
1205 Urban and Regional Planning
1604 Human Geography
Publication Status
Published
Article Number
ARTN 102808
Date Publish Online
2020-05-27