Repository logo
  • Log In
    Log in via Symplectic to deposit your publication(s).
Repository logo
  • Communities & Collections
  • Research Outputs
  • Statistics
  • Log In
    Log in via Symplectic to deposit your publication(s).
  1. Home
  2. Faculty of Medicine
  3. Department of Surgery and Cancer
  4. Department of Surgery and Cancer
  5. Development and uptake of an online systematic review platform: the early years of the CAMARADES Systematic Review Facility (SyRF)
 
  • Details
Development and uptake of an online systematic review platform: the early years of the CAMARADES Systematic Review Facility (SyRF)
File(s)
Development and uptake of an online systematic review platform the early years of the CAMARADES Systematic Review Facility (.pdf (1.1 MB)
Published version
Author(s)
Bahor, Zsanett
Liao, Jing
Currie, Gillian
Ayder, Can
Macleod, Malcolm
more
Type
Journal Article
Abstract
Preclinical research is a vital step in the drug discovery pipeline and more generally in helping to better understand human disease aetiology and its management. Systematic reviews (SRs) can be powerful in summarising and appraising this evidence concerning a specific research question, to highlight areas of improvements, areas for further research and areas where evidence may be sufficient to take forward to other research domains, for instance clinical trial. Guidance and tools for preclinical research synthesis remain limited despite their clear utility. We aimed to create an online end-to-end platform primarily for conducting SRs of preclinical studies, that was flexible enough to support a wide variety of experimental designs, was adaptable to different research questions, would allow users to adopt emerging automated tools and support them during their review process using best practice. In this article, we introduce the Systematic Review Facility (https://syrf.org.uk), which was launched in 2016 and designed to support primarily preclinical SRs from small independent projects to large, crowdsourced projects. We discuss the architecture of the app and its features, including the opportunity to collaborate easily, to efficiently manage projects, to screen and annotate studies for important features (metadata), to extract outcome data into a secure database, and tailor these steps to each project. We introduce how we are working to leverage the use of automation tools and allow the integration of these services to accelerate and automate steps in the systematic review workflow.
Date Issued
2021-03-01
Date Acceptance
2021-02-11
Citation
BMJ Open Science, 2021, 5 (1)
URI
http://hdl.handle.net/10044/1/103576
DOI
https://www.dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjos-2020-100103
ISSN
2398-8703
Publisher
BMJ Publishing Group
Journal / Book Title
BMJ Open Science
Volume
5
Issue
1
Copyright Statement
© Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2021. Re-use permitted under CC BY. Published by BMJ. This is an open access article distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 Unported (CC BY 4.0) license, which permits others to copy, redistribute, remix, transform and build upon this work for any purpose, provided the original work is properly cited, a link to the licence is given, and indication of whether changes were made. See: https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.
License URL
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
Publication Status
Published
Article Number
ARTN e100103
Date Publish Online
2021-03-31
About
Spiral Depositing with Spiral Publishing with Spiral Symplectic
Contact us
Open access team Report an issue
Other Services
Scholarly Communications Library Services
logo

Imperial College London

South Kensington Campus

London SW7 2AZ, UK

tel: +44 (0)20 7589 5111

Accessibility Modern slavery statement Cookie Policy

Built with DSpace-CRIS software - Extension maintained and optimized by 4Science

  • Cookie settings
  • Privacy policy
  • End User Agreement
  • Send Feedback