Predicting prostate surgery outcome from standard clinical assessments of lower urinary tract symptoms to derive prognostic symptom and flowmetry criteria
File(s)PIIS2405456923001542.pdf (1.21 MB)
Published version
Author(s)
Type
Journal Article
Abstract
Background; Assessment of male lower urinary tract symptoms (LUTS) needs to identify predictors of symptom outcomes, where interventional treatment is planned.
Objective; Develop a novel prediction model for prostate surgery outcomes and validate it using a separate patient cohort, deriving thresholds for key clinical parameters.
Design, Setting, and Participants; The UPSTREAM trial of 820 men seeking treatment for LUTS, analysing bladder diary (BD), IPSS, IPSS-QoL, and uroflowmetry data of 176 participants who underwent prostate surgery and provided complete data. External validation used a retrospective surgery outcomes database from a Japanese urology department (n = 227).
Outcome Measurements and Statistical Analysis; Symptom improvement was defined as ≥3 points reduction in total IPSS. Multiple logistic regression, classification tree analysis and random forest models were generated, including versions with and without BD data.
Results and Limitation; Multiple logistic regression without BD identified age (P=0.029), total IPSS (P=0.0016), and maximum flow rate (Qmax) (P=0.066) as predictors of outcome, with area under curve (AUC) of 77.1%. Classification tree analysis without BD gave thresholds of IPSS <16 and Qmax ≥13ml/sec, (AUC of 75.0%). Random forest model, involving all clinical parameters except BD, had AUC of 94.7%. Internal validation by bootstrap method showed reasonable AUCs (69.6-85.8%). Analyses using BD data improved the model fits marginally. External validation gave comparable AUCs for logistic regression, classification tree analysis and random forest (all without BD) (70.9%, 67.3% and 68.5%, respectively). Limitations included the significant number of men providing incomplete baseline data, and limited assessments in the external validation cohort.
Conclusions; Outcome of prostate surgery is predicted preoperatively by age, total IPSS and uroflowmetry, with prognostic thresholds of 16 for IPSS and 13 ml/sec for Qmax.
Patient Summary; This study identified key preoperative factors that can predict prostate surgery outcome, including which patients are at risk of bad outcome.
Objective; Develop a novel prediction model for prostate surgery outcomes and validate it using a separate patient cohort, deriving thresholds for key clinical parameters.
Design, Setting, and Participants; The UPSTREAM trial of 820 men seeking treatment for LUTS, analysing bladder diary (BD), IPSS, IPSS-QoL, and uroflowmetry data of 176 participants who underwent prostate surgery and provided complete data. External validation used a retrospective surgery outcomes database from a Japanese urology department (n = 227).
Outcome Measurements and Statistical Analysis; Symptom improvement was defined as ≥3 points reduction in total IPSS. Multiple logistic regression, classification tree analysis and random forest models were generated, including versions with and without BD data.
Results and Limitation; Multiple logistic regression without BD identified age (P=0.029), total IPSS (P=0.0016), and maximum flow rate (Qmax) (P=0.066) as predictors of outcome, with area under curve (AUC) of 77.1%. Classification tree analysis without BD gave thresholds of IPSS <16 and Qmax ≥13ml/sec, (AUC of 75.0%). Random forest model, involving all clinical parameters except BD, had AUC of 94.7%. Internal validation by bootstrap method showed reasonable AUCs (69.6-85.8%). Analyses using BD data improved the model fits marginally. External validation gave comparable AUCs for logistic regression, classification tree analysis and random forest (all without BD) (70.9%, 67.3% and 68.5%, respectively). Limitations included the significant number of men providing incomplete baseline data, and limited assessments in the external validation cohort.
Conclusions; Outcome of prostate surgery is predicted preoperatively by age, total IPSS and uroflowmetry, with prognostic thresholds of 16 for IPSS and 13 ml/sec for Qmax.
Patient Summary; This study identified key preoperative factors that can predict prostate surgery outcome, including which patients are at risk of bad outcome.
Date Issued
2024-01
Date Acceptance
2023-06-22
Citation
European Urology Focus, 2024, 10 (1), pp.197-204
ISSN
2405-4569
Publisher
Elsevier
Start Page
197
End Page
204
Journal / Book Title
European Urology Focus
Volume
10
Issue
1
Copyright Statement
©2023 The Author(s). Published by Elsevier B.V. on behalf of European Association of Urology. This is an open access article
under the CC BY license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
under the CC BY license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
License URL
Identifier
https://www.eu-focus.europeanurology.com/article/S2405-4569(23)00154-2/fulltext
Publication Status
Published
Date Publish Online
2023-07-15