A validated finite element analysis procedure for porous structures
File(s)1-s2.0-S0264127520300794-main.pdf (2.72 MB)
Published version
Author(s)
de Galarreta, Sergio
Jeffers, Jonathan
Ghouse, Shaaz
Type
Journal Article
Abstract
Cellular materials are gaining interest thanks to developments in additive manufacturing. Whilst Finite Element Analysis (FEA) is commonly used to obtain the mechanical behaviour of these structures, different modelling and simulation methodologies are followed in literature. Consequently, there is not a clear procedure to accurately evaluate the mechanical properties of porous structures. This study presents a method to perform FEA of lattice structures with accurate results. All inputs required to simulate compression testing of lattices in FEA were investigated, these included the modelling type, element size, number of unit cells required, boundary conditions and the material model. The effect of these variables on the modulus and yield strength of a lattice structure was studied.
Lattices with two unit cell structures, varying unit cell sizes and relative densities were additively manufactured in stainless steel, compression tested and compared to FE simulations. The material model for the FE simulations was obtained from tensile testing individual micro-struts of varying diameters. FE simulation results were in good agreement with the experimental results with an average error for the modulus and yield strength of ~10% and 17% respectively. The methodology presented should provide a foundation to accelerate development and adoption of these structures.
Lattices with two unit cell structures, varying unit cell sizes and relative densities were additively manufactured in stainless steel, compression tested and compared to FE simulations. The material model for the FE simulations was obtained from tensile testing individual micro-struts of varying diameters. FE simulation results were in good agreement with the experimental results with an average error for the modulus and yield strength of ~10% and 17% respectively. The methodology presented should provide a foundation to accelerate development and adoption of these structures.
Date Issued
2020-04
Date Acceptance
2020-02-03
Citation
Materials and Design, 2020, 189, pp.1-14
ISSN
0264-1275
Publisher
Elsevier
Start Page
1
End Page
14
Journal / Book Title
Materials and Design
Volume
189
Copyright Statement
© 2020 The Authors. Published by Elsevier Ltd. This is an open access article under the CC BY license http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
Sponsor
Engineering & Physical Science Research Council (EPSRC)
Wellcome Trust
Engineering & Physical Science Research Council (EPSRC)
Identifier
https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0264127520300794?via%3Dihub
Grant Number
EP/K027549/1
208858/Z/17/Z
EP/R042721/1
Subjects
Materials
0910 Manufacturing Engineering
0912 Materials Engineering
0913 Mechanical Engineering
Publication Status
Published
Date Publish Online
2020-02-04