During haptic communication, the central nervous system compensates distinctly for delay and noise
File(s)journal.pcbi.1012037.pdf (1.87 MB)
Published version
Author(s)
Eden, Jonathan
Ivanova, Ekaterina
Burdet, Etienne
Type
Journal Article
Abstract
Physically connected humans have been shown to exploit the exchange of haptic forces
and tactile information to improve their performance in joint action tasks. As human interac tions are increasingly mediated through robots and networks it is important to understand
the impact that network features such as lag and noise may have on human behaviour. In
this paper, we investigated interaction with a human-like robot controller that provides simi lar haptic communication behaviour as human-human interaction and examined the influ ence and compensation mechanisms for delay and noise on haptic communication. The
results of our experiments show that participants can perceive a difference between noise
and delay, and make use of compensation mechanisms to preserve performance in both
cases. However, while noise is compensated for by increasing co-contraction, delay com pensation could not be explained by this strategy. Instead, computational modelling sug gested that a distinct mechanism is used to compensate for the delay and yield an efficient
haptic communication.
and tactile information to improve their performance in joint action tasks. As human interac tions are increasingly mediated through robots and networks it is important to understand
the impact that network features such as lag and noise may have on human behaviour. In
this paper, we investigated interaction with a human-like robot controller that provides simi lar haptic communication behaviour as human-human interaction and examined the influ ence and compensation mechanisms for delay and noise on haptic communication. The
results of our experiments show that participants can perceive a difference between noise
and delay, and make use of compensation mechanisms to preserve performance in both
cases. However, while noise is compensated for by increasing co-contraction, delay com pensation could not be explained by this strategy. Instead, computational modelling sug gested that a distinct mechanism is used to compensate for the delay and yield an efficient
haptic communication.
Editor(s)
Haith, Adrian M
Date Issued
2024-11-06
Date Acceptance
2024-10-18
Citation
PLoS Computational Biology, 2024, 20 (11)
ISSN
1553-734X
Publisher
Public Library of Science (PLoS)
Journal / Book Title
PLoS Computational Biology
Volume
20
Issue
11
License URL
Identifier
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/39504311
PII: PCOMPBIOL-D-24-00534
Subjects
Biochemical Research Methods
Biochemistry & Molecular Biology
FORCE FEEDBACK
Life Sciences & Biomedicine
Mathematical & Computational Biology
PERCEPTION
Science & Technology
TIME-DELAY
VISUAL FEEDBACK
Publication Status
Published
Coverage Spatial
United States
Article Number
e1012037
Date Publish Online
2024-11-06