Using patient-reported outcome measures to evaluate care for patients with inflammatory chronic rheumatic disease
File(s)1-s2.0-S1098301522020009-main.pdf (625.93 KB)
Published version
Author(s)
Type
Journal Article
Abstract
Objectives: Few countries integrate Patient-Reported Outcome Measures (PROMs) in routine performance assessment, and those that do focus on elective surgery. This study addresses the challenges of using PROMs to evaluate care in chronic conditions. We set out a modelling strategy to assess the extent to which changes over time in self-reported health status by patients with inflammatory chronic rheumatic disease are related to their biological drug therapy and Rheumatology centre primarily responsible for their care.
Methods: Using data from the Portuguese Register of Rheumatic Diseases, we assess the health status using the Health Assessment Questionnaire-Disability Index (HAQ-DI) for rheumatic patients receiving biological drugs between 2000 and 2017. We employ a fixed effects model using the Least Squares Dummy Variables estimator.
Results: Patients receiving infliximab or rituximab report lower health status than those on etanercept (the most common therapy) and patients in 4 of the 26 Rheumatology centres report higher health status than those at other centres.
Conclusions: PROMs can be used for those with chronic conditions to provide the patient’s perspective about the impact on their health status of the choice of drug therapy and care provider. Care for chronic patients might be improved if healthcare organisations monitor PROMs and engage in performance assessment initiatives on a routine basis.
Methods: Using data from the Portuguese Register of Rheumatic Diseases, we assess the health status using the Health Assessment Questionnaire-Disability Index (HAQ-DI) for rheumatic patients receiving biological drugs between 2000 and 2017. We employ a fixed effects model using the Least Squares Dummy Variables estimator.
Results: Patients receiving infliximab or rituximab report lower health status than those on etanercept (the most common therapy) and patients in 4 of the 26 Rheumatology centres report higher health status than those at other centres.
Conclusions: PROMs can be used for those with chronic conditions to provide the patient’s perspective about the impact on their health status of the choice of drug therapy and care provider. Care for chronic patients might be improved if healthcare organisations monitor PROMs and engage in performance assessment initiatives on a routine basis.
Date Issued
2022-11-01
Date Acceptance
2022-05-17
Citation
Value in Health, 2022, 25 (11), pp.1885-1893
ISSN
1098-3015
Publisher
Elsevier
Start Page
1885
End Page
1893
Journal / Book Title
Value in Health
Volume
25
Issue
11
Copyright Statement
© 2022, International Society for Pharmacoeconomics and Outcomes Research, Inc. Published by Elsevier Inc. This is an open access article
under the CC BY-NC-ND license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/).
under the CC BY-NC-ND license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/).
License URL
Publication Status
Published
Date Publish Online
2022-06-23