Tri-Helical Gravure Roll Coating
File(s)Chemical Engineering Science_65_4_2010.pdf (199.37 KB)
Accepted version
Author(s)
Hewson, RW
Kapur, N
Gaskell, PH
Type
Journal Article
Abstract
A mathematical model is presented and solved for the fluid flow within the coating bead of a tri-helical gravure roll coater, operating in reverse mode. A variety of rolls etched circumferentially with grooves of different cross-sectional shape and aligned at non-zero angles of pitch are investigated. Predictions of fluid pick-out from the grooves are compared with complementary experimental data. Quantitative agreement between the two is found to be very good, showing a linear increase in pickout as a function of web-to-roll speed ratio and groove depths up to the point at which streaking, as observed experimentally, occurs and beyond which the model is no longer valid. In regions of parameter space for which there is no experimental data available for comparison purposes the model predicts that: (i) fluid pick-out decreases with increasing groove depth while the film thickness tends to increase and (ii) an increase in groove aspect ratio leads to a reduction in both pick-out and film thickness for a given land width and groove cross-sectional shape. © 2009 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
Date Issued
2010-02
Citation
Chemical Engineering Science, 2010, 65 (4), pp.1311-1321
ISSN
0009-2509
Publisher
Elsevier
Start Page
1311
End Page
1321
Journal / Book Title
Chemical Engineering Science
Volume
65
Issue
4
Copyright Statement
Copyright © 2009 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved. NOTICE: this is the author’s version of a work that was accepted for publication in Chemical Engineering Science. Changes resulting from the publishing process, such as peer review, editing, corrections, structural formatting, and other quality control mechanisms may not be reflected in this document. Changes may have been made to this work since it was submitted for publication. A definitive version was subsequently published in Chemical Engineering Science, 65(4), 2010. DOI:10.1016/j.ces.2009.09.047