Surgery for recurrent epithelial ovarian cancer
File(s)s11912-023-01480-8.pdf (642.99 KB)
Published version
Author(s)
Fotopoulou, Christina
Eriksson, Ane Gerda
Yagel, Itai
Chang, Suk-Joon
Lim, Myong Cheol
Type
Journal Article
Abstract
Purpose of Review
To review evidence around the value and challenges of surgery for recurrent epithelial ovarian cancer (ROC). Both cytoreductive and palliative aspects will be addressed
Recent Findings
Prospective and retrospective evidence demonstrates a significantly longer remission derived from the combination of surgical and systemic modalities as opposed to systemic treatment alone in carefully selected ROC-patients who have relapsed more than 6 months from the end of their 1st line platinum-based chemotherapy. Nevertheless, this benefit appears to be limited when total macroscopic tumor clearance is not achieved. Selection algorithms to identify optimal surgical candidates are of paramount importance to prevent surgical morbidity without the equivalent oncological benefit. In the palliative setting, the risks and benefits of salvage surgery need to be counterbalanced with the advances of conservative techniques for optimal care.
Summary
Well-defined selection algorithms to identify those who will benefit from surgery in the relapsed setting appear to be the key to oncologic and surgical success.
To review evidence around the value and challenges of surgery for recurrent epithelial ovarian cancer (ROC). Both cytoreductive and palliative aspects will be addressed
Recent Findings
Prospective and retrospective evidence demonstrates a significantly longer remission derived from the combination of surgical and systemic modalities as opposed to systemic treatment alone in carefully selected ROC-patients who have relapsed more than 6 months from the end of their 1st line platinum-based chemotherapy. Nevertheless, this benefit appears to be limited when total macroscopic tumor clearance is not achieved. Selection algorithms to identify optimal surgical candidates are of paramount importance to prevent surgical morbidity without the equivalent oncological benefit. In the palliative setting, the risks and benefits of salvage surgery need to be counterbalanced with the advances of conservative techniques for optimal care.
Summary
Well-defined selection algorithms to identify those who will benefit from surgery in the relapsed setting appear to be the key to oncologic and surgical success.
Date Issued
2024-01
Date Acceptance
2023-11-22
Citation
Current Oncology Reports, 2024, 26 (1), pp.46-54
ISSN
1523-3790
Publisher
Springer
Start Page
46
End Page
54
Journal / Book Title
Current Oncology Reports
Volume
26
Issue
1
Copyright Statement
© The Author(s) 2023. Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.
License URL
Identifier
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/38091202
Subjects
Carcinoma, Ovarian Epithelial
Cytoreduction Surgical Procedures
Female
Humans
Neoplasm Recurrence, Local
Ovarian Neoplasms
Prospective Studies
Retrospective Studies
Ovarian cancer
Progression
Relapse
Secondary
Surgery
Survival
Publication Status
Published
Coverage Spatial
United States
Date Publish Online
2023-12-13