EMT−RMS modeling trade-off for IBR-driven sub-synchronous oscillations
File(s)
Author(s)
Javaid, Muhammad Sharjeel
Chaudhuri, Balarko
Teng, fei
Akhtar, zohaib
Type
Journal Article
Abstract
Low-frequency electromechanical oscillations (<2
Hz) are time-separated from faster network dynamics, allowing network dynamics to be safely neglected in positive-sequence RMS (RMS+) studies. However, with increasing shares of inverter-based resources (IBRs), sub-synchronous oscillations (SSOs) occur at higher frequencies (>5 Hz) within the electromagnetic timescales. The shift challenges using RMS+ tools for planning IBR-dominated grids, as the time-scale separation is no longer as distinct as in synchronous machine-based systems. This paper demonstrates that relying on RMS+ studies in high-IBR
scenarios can lead to erroneous conclusions about SSO, including a false assurance of stability. We explain how the interaction between IBR control and network dynamics affect the damping of SSO. This highlights the need for EMT-dq with network dynamics in a synchronously rotating reference frame as a middle ground between EMT-abc (point-on-wave) and RMS+ for studying IBR-driven
SSO. EMT-dq is computationally simpler than EMTabc
and allows frequency-domain analysis for deeper insight
and effective SSO mitigation. This emphasizes the necessity of established (rather than bespoke) EMT-dq tools to quickly screen SSO-prone scenarios for detailed investigation in EMT-abc.
Hz) are time-separated from faster network dynamics, allowing network dynamics to be safely neglected in positive-sequence RMS (RMS+) studies. However, with increasing shares of inverter-based resources (IBRs), sub-synchronous oscillations (SSOs) occur at higher frequencies (>5 Hz) within the electromagnetic timescales. The shift challenges using RMS+ tools for planning IBR-dominated grids, as the time-scale separation is no longer as distinct as in synchronous machine-based systems. This paper demonstrates that relying on RMS+ studies in high-IBR
scenarios can lead to erroneous conclusions about SSO, including a false assurance of stability. We explain how the interaction between IBR control and network dynamics affect the damping of SSO. This highlights the need for EMT-dq with network dynamics in a synchronously rotating reference frame as a middle ground between EMT-abc (point-on-wave) and RMS+ for studying IBR-driven
SSO. EMT-dq is computationally simpler than EMTabc
and allows frequency-domain analysis for deeper insight
and effective SSO mitigation. This emphasizes the necessity of established (rather than bespoke) EMT-dq tools to quickly screen SSO-prone scenarios for detailed investigation in EMT-abc.
Date Issued
2025-07-19
Date Acceptance
2025-07-01
Citation
IEEE Transactions on Power Systems, 2025
ISSN
0885-8950
Publisher
Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers
Journal / Book Title
IEEE Transactions on Power Systems
Copyright Statement
Copyright © 2025 IEEE. This is the author’s accepted manuscript made available under a CC-BY licence in accordance with Imperial’s Research Publications Open Access policy (www.imperial.ac.uk/oa-policy)
License URL
Publication Status
Published online
Article Number
TPWRS-01777-2024.R2
Date Publish Online
2025-07-17