A systematic review of economic evaluations of population-based sodium reduction interventions
File(s)journal.pone.0173600.pdf (1.14 MB)
Published version
Author(s)
Type
Journal Article
Abstract
Objective:
To summarise evidence describing the cost-effectiveness of population-based interventions targeting sodium reduction.
Methods:
A systematic search of published and grey literature databases and websites was conducted using specified key words. Characteristics of identified economic evaluations were recorded, and included studies were appraised for reporting quality using the Consolidated Health Economic Evaluation Reporting Standards (CHEERS) checklist.
Results:
Twenty studies met the study inclusion criteria and received a full paper review. Fourteen studies were identified as full economic evaluations in that they included both costs and benefits associated with an intervention measured against a comparator. Most studies were modelling exercises based on scenarios for achieving salt reduction and assumed effects on health outcomes. All 14 studies concluded that their specified intervention(s) targeting reductions in population sodium consumption were cost-effective, and in the majority of cases, were cost saving. Just over half the studies (8/14) were assessed as being of ‘excellent’ reporting quality, five studies fell into the ‘very good’ quality category and one into the ‘good’ category. All of the identified evaluations were based on modelling, whereby inputs for all the key parameters including the effect size were either drawn from published datasets, existing literature or based on expert advice.
Conclusion:
Despite a clear increase in evaluations of salt reduction programs in recent years, this review identified relatively few economic evaluations of population salt reduction interventions. None of the studies were based on actual implementation of intervention(s) and the associated collection of new empirical data. The studies universally showed that population-based salt reduction strategies are likely to be cost effective or cost saving. However, given the reliance on modelling, there is a need for the effectiveness of new interventions to be evaluated in the field using strong study designs and parallel economic evaluations.
To summarise evidence describing the cost-effectiveness of population-based interventions targeting sodium reduction.
Methods:
A systematic search of published and grey literature databases and websites was conducted using specified key words. Characteristics of identified economic evaluations were recorded, and included studies were appraised for reporting quality using the Consolidated Health Economic Evaluation Reporting Standards (CHEERS) checklist.
Results:
Twenty studies met the study inclusion criteria and received a full paper review. Fourteen studies were identified as full economic evaluations in that they included both costs and benefits associated with an intervention measured against a comparator. Most studies were modelling exercises based on scenarios for achieving salt reduction and assumed effects on health outcomes. All 14 studies concluded that their specified intervention(s) targeting reductions in population sodium consumption were cost-effective, and in the majority of cases, were cost saving. Just over half the studies (8/14) were assessed as being of ‘excellent’ reporting quality, five studies fell into the ‘very good’ quality category and one into the ‘good’ category. All of the identified evaluations were based on modelling, whereby inputs for all the key parameters including the effect size were either drawn from published datasets, existing literature or based on expert advice.
Conclusion:
Despite a clear increase in evaluations of salt reduction programs in recent years, this review identified relatively few economic evaluations of population salt reduction interventions. None of the studies were based on actual implementation of intervention(s) and the associated collection of new empirical data. The studies universally showed that population-based salt reduction strategies are likely to be cost effective or cost saving. However, given the reliance on modelling, there is a need for the effectiveness of new interventions to be evaluated in the field using strong study designs and parallel economic evaluations.
Date Issued
2017-03-29
Date Acceptance
2017-02-23
Citation
PLOS ONE, 2017, 12 (3)
ISSN
1932-6203
Publisher
PUBLIC LIBRARY OF SCIENCE
Journal / Book Title
PLOS ONE
Volume
12
Issue
3
Copyright Statement
© 2017 Hope et al. This is an open
access
article
distributed
under
the terms
of the
Creative
Commons
Attribution
License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/),
which
permits
unrestricte
d use, distribu
tion, and
reproduction
in any medium,
provided
the original
author
and source
are credited.
access
article
distributed
under
the terms
of the
Creative
Commons
Attribution
License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/),
which
permits
unrestricte
d use, distribu
tion, and
reproduction
in any medium,
provided
the original
author
and source
are credited.
Identifier
http://gateway.webofknowledge.com/gateway/Gateway.cgi?GWVersion=2&SrcApp=PARTNER_APP&SrcAuth=LinksAMR&KeyUT=WOS:000399174600019&DestLinkType=FullRecord&DestApp=ALL_WOS&UsrCustomerID=1ba7043ffcc86c417c072aa74d649202
Subjects
Science & Technology
Multidisciplinary Sciences
Science & Technology - Other Topics
COST-EFFECTIVENESS ANALYSIS
CORONARY-HEART-DISEASE
REDUCING SALT INTAKE
CARDIOVASCULAR-DISEASE
BLOOD-PRESSURE
DIETARY-SODIUM
TOBACCO USE
HEALTH
STRATEGIES
BURDEN
General Science & Technology
MD Multidisciplinary
Publication Status
Published
Article Number
ARTN e0173600