Gender differences in experiences and expectations of haemodialysis in a frail and seriously unwell patient population
File(s)1-s2.0-S2468024922017247-main.pdf (608.22 KB)
Published version
Author(s)
Type
Journal Article
Abstract
Introduction
Surprisingly few studies have explored the experiences of seriously unwell people with kidney disease on haemodialysis therapy: we conducted a mixed-methods study to investigate gender differences in illness experience, symptom burden, treatment considerations or expectations in this cohort.
Methods
Seriously unwell people on haemodialysis (1-year mortality risk of >20%) at three hospital-based units were invited to take part in a structured interview or to complete the same questions independently via a questionnaire. 54 people took part (36 males, 18 females); data analysis was undertaken using a thematic approach.
Results
‘Desire to keep living’ is the most important and basic thought process when starting dialysis. Fear also predominates influencing risk assessment and decision-making. Once fear is managed, there are physical, social, practical and emotional issues to rationalise, but choice only seems possible if shared decision-making is part of the consultation.
Gender differences were seen in perceived hopes and expectations of treatment. Males were more likely to prioritise achievement of physical goals, with females prioritising a wish to feel well. Both genders reported significantly higher symptom scores than their healthcare provider perceived, however this difference was more marked in females. Dialysis regret existed in >50% of participants and 6/54 (11%) stated that they would have chosen no dialysis at all. Females were more likely to report feeling depressed (P=0.001).
Conclusion
Different genders approach treatment decisions and prioritise treatment expectations differently. Recognising this will allow personalised care plans to be developed and improve the experiences of seriously unwell people with kidney disease.
Surprisingly few studies have explored the experiences of seriously unwell people with kidney disease on haemodialysis therapy: we conducted a mixed-methods study to investigate gender differences in illness experience, symptom burden, treatment considerations or expectations in this cohort.
Methods
Seriously unwell people on haemodialysis (1-year mortality risk of >20%) at three hospital-based units were invited to take part in a structured interview or to complete the same questions independently via a questionnaire. 54 people took part (36 males, 18 females); data analysis was undertaken using a thematic approach.
Results
‘Desire to keep living’ is the most important and basic thought process when starting dialysis. Fear also predominates influencing risk assessment and decision-making. Once fear is managed, there are physical, social, practical and emotional issues to rationalise, but choice only seems possible if shared decision-making is part of the consultation.
Gender differences were seen in perceived hopes and expectations of treatment. Males were more likely to prioritise achievement of physical goals, with females prioritising a wish to feel well. Both genders reported significantly higher symptom scores than their healthcare provider perceived, however this difference was more marked in females. Dialysis regret existed in >50% of participants and 6/54 (11%) stated that they would have chosen no dialysis at all. Females were more likely to report feeling depressed (P=0.001).
Conclusion
Different genders approach treatment decisions and prioritise treatment expectations differently. Recognising this will allow personalised care plans to be developed and improve the experiences of seriously unwell people with kidney disease.
Date Issued
2022-11
Date Acceptance
2022-08-22
Citation
Kidney International Reports, 2022, 7 (11), pp.2421-2430
ISSN
2468-0249
Publisher
Elsevier
Start Page
2421
End Page
2430
Journal / Book Title
Kidney International Reports
Volume
7
Issue
11
Copyright Statement
© 2022 Published by Elsevier Inc. on behalf of the International Society of Nephrology. The Journal Pre-Proof version is available open access under a CC-BY-NC-ND License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/)
Identifier
https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2468024922017247?via%3Dihub
Publication Status
Published
Date Publish Online
2022-09-03